CACrown ArchivesThe cinema collection
Menu
Research dossier · People & Ideas

Vladimir Picheta

Belarusian historian (1878–1947)

Correspondence, annotated notebooks and portrait silhouettes prepared for research
People and ideasInterpretive dossier study · Crown Archives visual atlas
Record originEnglish Wikipedia
Text licenseCC BY-SA 4.0
Source revisionMay 21, 2026
Entity authorityQ2471182
Source-derived summary

Vladimir Ivanovich Picheta (Russian: Владимир Иванович Пичета; Belarusian: Уладзімір Іванавіч Пічэта; 21 October 1878, Poltava – 23 June 1947, Moscow) was a Belarusian and Soviet historian, first rector of the Belarusian State University (July 1921 – October 1929), academician of the Academy of Sciences of the BSSR since 1928, Honorary Professor of the BSSR (1926), Corresponding Member of the Academy of Sciences of the Soviet Union since 1939, Academician of the Academy of Sciences of the Soviet Union since 1946.

Biography

Picheta was born in Poltava. His father, Ivan (Jovan) Khristoforovich (1844–1920), a Serb by nationality, a native of the city of Mostar in Bosnia and Herzegovina (then under the Ottoman Empire), was the rector of the Vitebsk Theological Seminary and then Poltava Theological Seminary. The scientist's mother, Maria Grigorievna Grigorenko, of Ukrainian origin, was the daughter of a Kyiv official of the Treasury Chamber.

Picheta graduated from the Poltava Gymnasium in 1897, and 1901 – from the History and Philology Department of Moscow University. Vasily Klyuchevsky was the scientific supervisor of his diploma (then called candidate) work "Yuri Krizhanich on the Moscow State".

After graduation, he taught at secondary schools in Moscow, and from 1902 he worked in Ukraine (Korostyshev, Yekaterinoslav). In September 1905, Picheta returned to Moscow, where he taught first at secondary educational institutions, and from 1906 at higher educational institutions, giving lectures to workers. In 1909, the young scientist passed his master's exam, and in 1910 he was approved as a privat-docent of Moscow University. In February 1911, together with a group of professors and assistant professors, he left the university in protest against the activities of the Minister of Public Education L.A. Kasso.

Editorial summary

The public source identifies “Vladimir Picheta” as belarusian historian (1878–1947). This brief keeps that definition visible, then builds a research path around Vladimir, Picheta and Belarusian.

Editorial reviewA useful biographical orientation record, particularly for establishing names, roles and a first chronology. The current lead gives the account dated anchors—1878, 1947, 1921, 1929—that can be checked directly. The authority record carries competing date values—1878-10-09, 1878-10-21—which should remain separate until their references and qualifiers are resolved. Its value is orientation rather than verdict, with Vladimir, Picheta and Belarusian providing the first useful test.
Editorial analysis

Why this record matters

A short description can identify a subject without explaining its stakes. For “Vladimir Picheta”, the useful work is to connect “belarusian historian (1878–1947)” to the records capable of establishing context and consequence.

Evidence profile

Chronology provides the most reliable spine for this subject; interpretation should follow only after identities and dates are secure. The source revision retrieved here is dated May 21, 2026. The linked authority identifier is Q2471182. VIAF identifies the subject as 55226787. The Library of Congress control number is n81078338. 3 of 4 selected statements include explicit references; 0 carry qualifiers and 0 use preferred rank. The first chronological checks are 1878, 1947, 1921 and 1929.

Critical limits

Public reputation and documentary evidence do not always develop together; absence from a summary is not evidence of historical absence. The lead is largely declarative, so disagreement and counter-evidence require a deliberate search beyond the opening account. Authority statements aid reconciliation but still require their own references, qualifiers and ranks to be checked.

How to read it

Read biographical claims against dates, named institutions and the cited references. Distinguish a subject’s later reputation from evidence produced during their lifetime.

Best used for
  • Establishing names and roles
  • Building a first chronology
  • Locating cited institutions
Verify next

Personal papers, civil or court records, institutional files and the scholarship cited by the source.

Three-step research path

  1. Establish the record: confirm the title “Vladimir Picheta”, its source revision and the description used here.
  2. Expand the search: follow Vladimir Picheta primary sources, Vladimir Picheta archive and Vladimir research across catalogues and specialist indexes.
  3. Test the account: compare the strongest cited source with the responsible institution’s current record and note any disagreement.

Questions for further research

  1. Which source most directly establishes the central claim about “Vladimir Picheta”?
  2. Which claims depend on a single source or contested interpretation?
  3. How has the subject’s reputation changed across later accounts?
Subject index

Search terms from this dossier

Source & attribution

This entry incorporates text from Vladimir Picheta” on English Wikipedia. Contributors are listed in the page history. Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 License. Selected authority identifiers and statements are retrieved from Wikidata under CC0; their references and qualifiers remain part of the verification path.