CACrown ArchivesThe cinema collection
EN/FR
Search
Menu
Research dossier · General Reference

Villip, Wachtberg

human settlement in Germany

Cross-disciplinary reference desk with index cards, atlas, dictionary and catalogue
General referenceInterpretive dossier study · Crown Archives visual atlas
Record originEnglish Wikipedia
Text licenseCC BY-SA 4.0
Source revisionDec 11, 2024
Entity authorityQ2526225 ↗
Source-derived summary

Villip is a village in the municipality of Wachtberg in the Rhein-Sieg-Kreis in the state of North Rhine-Westphalia close to the town of Meckenheim in Germany.

The village was first referenced on 10 June 873 as Philuppa. The king, Louis the German, included it under the manor of the monastery of Stablo.

Editorial summary

This brief starts where responsible research should: with the source description of “Villip, Wachtberg” as human settlement in Germany. Everything that follows is an evidence route, not borrowed authority.

Editorial reviewA practical starting point whose main value is the path it opens into stronger specialist and primary sources. The current 52-word lead offers orientation but no explicit four-digit date, so chronology should not be assumed. The selected authority fields contribute no independent date. The account is most persuasive where Villip, Wachtberg and human can be independently traced.
Editorial analysis

Why this record matters

The subject matters to the general reference register because the source frames it as human settlement in Germany. Its deeper value depends on whether names, dates, institutions and citations support that framing.

Evidence profile

Vocabulary and entity names are the principal evidence signals here, because they determine the precision of every later search. The source revision retrieved here is dated Dec 11, 2024. The linked authority identifier is Q2526225. VIAF identifies the subject as 133772492. Authority coordinates are 50.637, 7.094. 1 of 2 selected statements include explicit references; 0 carry qualifiers and 0 use preferred rank.

Critical limits

The absence of detail may reflect summary conventions rather than a lack of surviving documentation. The lead is largely declarative, so disagreement and counter-evidence require a deliberate search beyond the opening account. Authority statements aid reconciliation but still require their own references, qualifiers and ranks to be checked.

How to read it

Use the entry as an orientation point, then follow its citations and revision history. Names, dates and institutional relationships should be checked against the original record.

Best used for
  • Subject orientation
  • Search vocabulary
  • Locating named sources
Verify next

The closest primary source, responsible institution and strongest cited specialist reference.

Three-step research path

  1. Establish the record: confirm the title “Villip, Wachtberg”, its source revision and the description used here.
  2. Expand the search: follow Villip, Wachtberg primary sources, Villip, Wachtberg archive and Villip research across catalogues and specialist indexes.
  3. Test the account: compare the strongest cited source with the responsible institution’s current record and note any disagreement.

Questions for further research

  1. Which source most directly establishes the central claim about “Villip, Wachtberg”?
  2. Which institution is responsible for the underlying evidence?
  3. Which cited source is closest to the event, object or claim?
Subject index

Search terms from this dossier

Source & attribution

This entry incorporates text from “Villip, Wachtberg” on English Wikipedia. Contributors are listed in the page history. Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 License. Selected authority identifiers and statements are retrieved from Wikidata under CC0; their references and qualifiers remain part of the verification path.