Vielle à roue et à manche
Early western musical instrument
The vielle à roue et à manche (literally "Viola of the wheel and neck", called dulcigurdy by some luthiers) is a modern term for an early music instrument, of unknown original name, of the hurdy-gurdy family, but distinct in that the notes were changed by fingering the neck rather than pressing tangent keys. The instrument has several strings which are constantly bowed by a spinning wheel turned by a crank, producing unbroken musical notes.
The instrument is attested on Plate XXII of Praetorius' 1619 treatise Syntagma Musicum.
The term dulcigurdy is a modern one, a portmanteau of Appalachian dulcimer and hurdy-gurdy. The instrument has also been mislabeled strohfiddel in modern times, since the caption at the bottom of Plate XXII uses this term (literally "straw fiddle"), but that term actually refers to the xylophone pictured next to the dulcigurdy. Praetorius does not appear to give a specific name for the instrument, instead lumping it in with the keyed hurdy-gurdy next to it as Bauern-Lyren or "peasant lyres."
Related instruments
The kaisatsuko is a modern experimental instrument in Japan very similar in concept to the dulcigurdy.
Begin with the source’s own compact description: “Vielle à roue et à manche” is early western musical instrument. The dossier treats that line as a proposition to test through Vielle, roue and manche, not as a finished interpretation.
Why this record matters
The phrase “early western musical instrument” supplies a clear boundary for inquiry. It also exposes the unanswered questions: who defined that boundary, when it became stable and which sources sit outside it.
The citation trail is more important than the brevity of the summary: it shows where individual claims can be examined in context. The source revision retrieved here is dated Aug 27, 2024. The linked authority identifier is Q5313356. None of the 0 selected statements returned an explicit reference. The first chronological checks are 1619.
Overview language is designed for orientation and should not be treated as a substitute for the evidence cited beneath it. The lead is largely declarative, so disagreement and counter-evidence require a deliberate search beyond the opening account. Authority statements aid reconciliation but still require their own references, qualifiers and ranks to be checked.
How to read it
Use the entry as an orientation point, then follow its citations and revision history. Names, dates and institutional relationships should be checked against the original record.
- Subject orientation
- Search vocabulary
- Locating named sources
The closest primary source, responsible institution and strongest cited specialist reference.
Three-step research path
- Establish the record: confirm the title “Vielle à roue et à manche”, its source revision and the description used here.
- Expand the search: follow Vielle à roue et à manche primary sources, Vielle à roue et à manche archive and Vielle research across catalogues and specialist indexes.
- Test the account: compare the strongest cited source with the responsible institution’s current record and note any disagreement.
Questions for further research
- Which source most directly establishes the central claim about “Vielle à roue et à manche”?
- Which cited source is closest to the event, object or claim?
- What terminology or title could unlock a more precise catalogue search?
Search terms from this dossier
This entry incorporates text from “Vielle à roue et à manche” on English Wikipedia. Contributors are listed in the page history. Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 License. Selected authority identifiers and statements are retrieved from Wikidata under CC0; their references and qualifiers remain part of the verification path.