CACrown ArchivesThe cinema collection
Menu
Research dossier · General Reference

Vertu Ti

smartphone model

Cross-disciplinary reference desk with index cards, atlas, dictionary and catalogue
General referenceInterpretive dossier study · Crown Archives visual atlas
Record originEnglish Wikipedia
Text licenseCC BY-SA 4.0
Source revisionJun 28, 2026
Entity authorityQ7922974
Source-derived summary

The Vertu Ti was an Android mobile phone made by Vertu in England. It had a titanium case and a sapphire screen. The phone retailed at £6700 (€7900, $10500).

It shared similar hardware and the same battery pack as Nokia's Lumia 920, and was also manufactured by Nokia, which formerly owned Vertu.

It was made of grade 5 Titanium, polished ceramic and partially covered with leather. The Vertu Ti was announced and released in February 2013. The phone had a 1.7 GHz dual-core CPU and 1 gigabyte of RAM, 64 gigabytes of built-in storage which could be increased by up to 32 gigabytes with a removable MicroSD memory card. The display was a 480 x 800, 3.7 inch TFT capacitive, multitouch, sapphire crystal glass touchscreen.

The phone had an 8-megapixel camera with autofocus, geo-tagging and an LED flash. The front-facing camera had a resolution of 1.3 megapixels.

Editorial summary

Begin with the source’s own compact description: “Vertu Ti” is smartphone model. The dossier treats that line as a proposition to test through Vertu, smartphone and model, not as a finished interpretation.

Editorial reviewA practical starting point whose main value is the path it opens into stronger specialist and primary sources. The current lead gives the account dated anchors—2013—that can be checked directly. The selected authority fields contribute no independent date. For this dossier, Vertu, smartphone and model is the immediate research focus.
Editorial analysis

Why this record matters

The phrase “smartphone model” supplies a clear boundary for inquiry. It also exposes the unanswered questions: who defined that boundary, when it became stable and which sources sit outside it.

Evidence profile

The citation trail is more important than the brevity of the summary: it shows where individual claims can be examined in context. The source revision retrieved here is dated Jun 28, 2026. The linked authority identifier is Q7922974. None of the 0 selected statements returned an explicit reference. The first chronological checks are 2013.

Critical limits

A concise general-reference account can conceal disagreements about scope, terminology or the weight assigned to individual sources. The source lead contains qualifying language; that uncertainty should survive quotation, summary and reuse. Authority statements aid reconciliation but still require their own references, qualifiers and ranks to be checked.

How to read it

Use the entry as an orientation point, then follow its citations and revision history. Names, dates and institutional relationships should be checked against the original record.

Best used for
  • Subject orientation
  • Search vocabulary
  • Locating named sources
Verify next

The closest primary source, responsible institution and strongest cited specialist reference.

Three-step research path

  1. Establish the record: confirm the title “Vertu Ti”, its source revision and the description used here.
  2. Expand the search: follow Vertu Ti primary sources, Vertu Ti archive and Vertu research across catalogues and specialist indexes.
  3. Test the account: compare the strongest cited source with the responsible institution’s current record and note any disagreement.

Questions for further research

  1. Which source most directly establishes the central claim about “Vertu Ti”?
  2. Which institution is responsible for the underlying evidence?
  3. Which cited source is closest to the event, object or claim?
Subject index

Search terms from this dossier

Source & attribution

This entry incorporates text from Vertu Ti” on English Wikipedia. Contributors are listed in the page history. Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 License. Selected authority identifiers and statements are retrieved from Wikidata under CC0; their references and qualifiers remain part of the verification path.