Veronica ciliolata
species of plant
Veronica ciliolata, commonly known as the fringed speedwell or small speedwell, is a species of flowering plant native to New Zealand. It belongs to the family Plantaginaceae and is known for its delicate fringed petals and compact growth habit.
Description
Veronica ciliolata was first described by botanist Thomas Cheeseman in 1906. It is a member of the Veronica genus, which includes over 500 species distributed worldwide. The specific epithet "ciliolata" refers to the small cilia or hairs present on the plant's leaves and stems.
The species is characterized by its small, lobed leaves and slender stems, which bear clusters of tiny, pale blue flowers with fringed petals. The flowers bloom in spring and summer, attracting pollinators such as bees and butterflies.
Habitat and distribution
Veronica ciliolata is endemic to New Zealand, where it is found in a variety of habitats, including grasslands, forests, and wetlands. It occurs throughout both the North and South Islands, often in moist, shaded areas with well-drained soils.
Threats and conservation
Veronica ciliolata plays a role in New Zealand's native ecosystems by providing nectar and pollen for pollinators and serving as a food source for herbivorous insects.
Begin with the source’s own compact description: “Veronica ciliolata” is species of plant. The dossier treats that line as a proposition to test through Veronica, ciliolata and species, not as a finished interpretation.
Why this record matters
The phrase “species of plant” supplies a clear boundary for inquiry. It also exposes the unanswered questions: who defined that boundary, when it became stable and which sources sit outside it.
The date and method of observation matter as much as the stated conclusion, especially where classification or consensus has changed. The source revision retrieved here is dated Jul 19, 2026. The linked authority identifier is Q15373218. None of the 0 selected statements returned an explicit reference. The first chronological checks are 1906.
A general summary may omit uncertainty, sample limits or methodological disagreement that is explicit in the technical record. The lead is largely declarative, so disagreement and counter-evidence require a deliberate search beyond the opening account. Authority statements aid reconciliation but still require their own references, qualifiers and ranks to be checked.
How to read it
Check terminology, classification and the date of the cited evidence. Scientific names and technical consensus can change while older records retain historical value.
- Current terminology
- Classification context
- Finding cited technical literature
Primary datasets, specimen catalogues, standards bodies and the most recent peer-reviewed literature.
Three-step research path
- Establish the record: confirm the title “Veronica ciliolata”, its source revision and the description used here.
- Expand the search: follow Veronica ciliolata primary sources, Veronica ciliolata archive and Veronica research across catalogues and specialist indexes.
- Test the account: compare the strongest cited source with the responsible institution’s current record and note any disagreement.
Questions for further research
- Which source most directly establishes the central claim about “Veronica ciliolata”?
- Is the terminology current, historical or disputed?
- Which observation, specimen, dataset or publication supports the account?
Search terms from this dossier
This entry incorporates text from “Veronica ciliolata” on English Wikipedia. Contributors are listed in the page history. Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 License. Selected authority identifiers and statements are retrieved from Wikidata under CC0; their references and qualifiers remain part of the verification path.