CACrown ArchivesThe cinema collection
EN/FR
Search
Menu
Research dossier · History & Society

Vasile Colța

Member of Parliament

Layered newspapers, civic records and oral-history reels arranged as chronological evidence
History and societyInterpretive dossier study · Crown Archives visual atlas
Record originEnglish Wikipedia
Text licenseCC BY-SA 4.0
Source revisionApr 16, 2026
Entity authorityQ7916599 ↗
Source-derived summary

Vasile Colța (born 1953) is a Moldovan politician.

Biography

He served as member of the Parliament of Moldova (2005–2009), on the lists of the Electoral Bloc Democratic Moldova.

Editorial summary

Begin with the source’s own compact description: “Vasile Colța” is member of Parliament. The dossier treats that line as a proposition to test through Vasile, Colța and Member, not as a finished interpretation.

Editorial reviewA strong contextual entry point for chronology, institutions and public events when official records are distinguished from later interpretation. The current lead gives the account dated anchors—1953, 2005, 2009—that can be checked directly. The linked authority record independently contributes the date 1953. For this dossier, Vasile, Colța and Member is the immediate research focus.
Editorial analysis

Why this record matters

The phrase “member of Parliament” supplies a clear boundary for inquiry. It also exposes the unanswered questions: who defined that boundary, when it became stable and which sources sit outside it.

Evidence profile

The record creator and administrative purpose are central evidence, because official documentation reflects both action and institutional priorities. The source revision retrieved here is dated Apr 16, 2026. The linked authority identifier is Q7916599. None of the 1 selected statements returned an explicit reference. The first chronological checks are 1953, 2005 and 2009.

Critical limits

Institutional narratives can privilege the records that survived while minimizing voices that were never formally collected. The lead is largely declarative, so disagreement and counter-evidence require a deliberate search beyond the opening account. Authority statements aid reconciliation but still require their own references, qualifiers and ranks to be checked.

How to read it

Compare institutional narratives with records created by participants and affected communities. Dates and formal titles are useful anchors, but not substitutes for context.

Best used for
  • Event chronology
  • Institutional context
  • Locating named record creators
Verify next

Contemporary correspondence, government or organizational records, oral histories and cited historical scholarship.

Three-step research path

  1. Establish the record: confirm the title “Vasile Colța”, its source revision and the description used here.
  2. Expand the search: follow Vasile Colța primary sources, Vasile Colța archive and Vasile research across catalogues and specialist indexes.
  3. Test the account: compare the strongest cited source with the responsible institution’s current record and note any disagreement.

Questions for further research

  1. Which source most directly establishes the central claim about “Vasile Colța”?
  2. Which voices are present, absent or mediated by the institution?
  3. Who created the surviving record, and for what administrative purpose?
Subject index

Search terms from this dossier

Source & attribution

This entry incorporates text from “Vasile Colța” on English Wikipedia. Contributors are listed in the page history. Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 License. Selected authority identifiers and statements are retrieved from Wikidata under CC0; their references and qualifiers remain part of the verification path.