Variation ratio
Open-knowledge reference entry

The variation ratio is a simple measure of statistical dispersion in nominal distributions; it is the simplest measure of qualitative variation.
It is defined as the proportion of cases which are not in the mode category:
v
:=
1
−
f
m
N
,
{\displaystyle \mathbf {v} :=1-{\frac {f_{m}}{N}},}
where fm is the frequency (number of cases) of the mode, and N is the total number of cases. While a simple measure, it is notable in that some texts and guides suggest or imply that the dispersion of nominal measurements cannot be ascertained. It is defined for instance by (Freeman 1965).
Just as with the range or standard deviation, the larger the variation ratio, the more differentiated or dispersed the data are; and the smaller the variation ratio, the more concentrated and similar the data are.
An example
A group which is 55% female and 45% male has a proportion of 0.55 female (the mode is 0.55), therefore its variation ratio is
v
=
1
−
0.55
1
=
0.45
,
{\displaystyle \mathbf {v} =1-{\frac {0.55}{1}}=0.45,}
Similarly, in a group of 100 people where 60 people like beer, 25 people like wine, and the rest (15) prefer cocktails, the variation ratio is
v
=
1
−
60
100
=
0.4
,
{\displaystyle \mathbf {v} =1-{\frac {60}{100}}=0.4,}
See also
Qualitative variation, for a number of other measures of dispersion in nominal variables
References
Freeman, Linton C. (1965), Elementary Applied Statistics, New York: John Wiley and Sons, pp.
The public source identifies “Variation ratio” as open-knowledge reference entry. This brief keeps that definition visible, then builds a research path around Variation, ratio and Open-knowledge.
Why this record matters
A short description can identify a subject without explaining its stakes. For “Variation ratio”, the useful work is to connect “open-knowledge reference entry” to the records capable of establishing context and consequence.
The citation trail is more important than the brevity of the summary: it shows where individual claims can be examined in context. The source revision retrieved here is dated Jan 21, 2026. The linked authority identifier is Q17117986. None of the 0 selected statements returned an explicit reference. The first chronological checks are 1965.
Overview language is designed for orientation and should not be treated as a substitute for the evidence cited beneath it. The lead is largely declarative, so disagreement and counter-evidence require a deliberate search beyond the opening account. Authority statements aid reconciliation but still require their own references, qualifiers and ranks to be checked.
How to read it
Use the entry as an orientation point, then follow its citations and revision history. Names, dates and institutional relationships should be checked against the original record.
- Subject orientation
- Search vocabulary
- Locating named sources
The closest primary source, responsible institution and strongest cited specialist reference.
Three-step research path
- Establish the record: confirm the title “Variation ratio”, its source revision and the description used here.
- Expand the search: follow Variation ratio primary sources, Variation ratio archive and Variation research across catalogues and specialist indexes.
- Test the account: compare the strongest cited source with the responsible institution’s current record and note any disagreement.
Questions for further research
- Which source most directly establishes the central claim about “Variation ratio”?
- What terminology or title could unlock a more precise catalogue search?
- Which institution is responsible for the underlying evidence?
Search terms from this dossier
This entry incorporates text from “Variation ratio” on English Wikipedia. Contributors are listed in the page history. Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 License. Selected authority identifiers and statements are retrieved from Wikidata under CC0; their references and qualifiers remain part of the verification path.