Vahe Engibarian
Open-knowledge reference entry
Vahe Engibarian (born June 1, 1976, Yerevan) is an Armenian entrepreneur and former diplomat. His activities include premium lifestyle management, financial technology, real estate development, architecture, cultural projects and social entrepreneurship. Since 2017, he has served as chairman of the Board of the public organisation "Armenian Assembly".
Early and personal life
V. Engibarian was born in Yerevan. He is the son of Robert Engibarian, Doctor of Law, professor at Moscow State Institute of International Relations (MGIMO), and Honoured Scientist of the Russian Federation. He graduated from the Moscow State Institute of International Relations (MGIMO).
Vahe Engibarian graduated from MGIMO and received a Candidate of Legal Sciences degree in 2000. His dissertation was titled Federalism in the Modern World: Legal Status and Key Features.
Engibarian joined the Ministry of Foreign Affairs of the Russian Federation in 1996 and held several positions within its Department of North America.
From 2001 to 2003, he served as Deputy Consul of the Russian Federation in New York.
The public source identifies “Vahe Engibarian” as open-knowledge reference entry. This brief keeps that definition visible, then builds a research path around Vahe, Engibarian and Open-knowledge.
Why this record matters
A short description can identify a subject without explaining its stakes. For “Vahe Engibarian”, the useful work is to connect “open-knowledge reference entry” to the records capable of establishing context and consequence.
The citation trail is more important than the brevity of the summary: it shows where individual claims can be examined in context. The source revision retrieved here is dated Sep 20, 2026. The linked authority identifier is Q138511816. None of the 1 selected statements returned an explicit reference. The first chronological checks are 1976, 2017, 2000 and 1996.
Overview language is designed for orientation and should not be treated as a substitute for the evidence cited beneath it. The lead is largely declarative, so disagreement and counter-evidence require a deliberate search beyond the opening account. Authority statements aid reconciliation but still require their own references, qualifiers and ranks to be checked.
How to read it
Use the entry as an orientation point, then follow its citations and revision history. Names, dates and institutional relationships should be checked against the original record.
- Subject orientation
- Search vocabulary
- Locating named sources
The closest primary source, responsible institution and strongest cited specialist reference.
Three-step research path
- Establish the record: confirm the title “Vahe Engibarian”, its source revision and the description used here.
- Expand the search: follow Vahe Engibarian primary sources, Vahe Engibarian archive and Vahe research across catalogues and specialist indexes.
- Test the account: compare the strongest cited source with the responsible institution’s current record and note any disagreement.
Questions for further research
- Which source most directly establishes the central claim about “Vahe Engibarian”?
- Which cited source is closest to the event, object or claim?
- Which institution is responsible for the underlying evidence?
Search terms from this dossier
This entry incorporates text from “Vahe Engibarian” on English Wikipedia. Contributors are listed in the page history. Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 License. Selected authority identifiers and statements are retrieved from Wikidata under CC0; their references and qualifiers remain part of the verification path.