CACrown ArchivesThe cinema collection
Menu
Research dossier · General Reference

Vacuum permittivity

physical constant defining the capability of an electric field to permeate a vacuum

Cross-disciplinary reference desk with index cards, atlas, dictionary and catalogue
General referenceInterpretive dossier study · Crown Archives visual atlas
Record originEnglish Wikipedia
Text licenseCC BY-SA 4.0
Source revisionJul 28, 2026
Entity authorityQ6158
Source-derived summary

Vacuum permittivity, commonly denoted ε0 (pronounced "epsilon nought" or "epsilon zero"), is the value of the absolute dielectric permittivity of classical vacuum. It may also be referred to as the permittivity of free space, the electric constant, or the distributed capacitance of the vacuum. It is an ideal (baseline) physical constant. Its CODATA value is:

It is a measure of how dense of an electric field is "permitted" to form in response to electric charges and relates the units for electric charge to mechanical quantities such as length and force. For example, the force between two separated electric charges with spherical symmetry (in the vacuum of classical electromagnetism) is given by Coulomb's law:

F

C

=

1

4

π

ε

0

q

1

q

2

r

2

{\displaystyle F_{\text{C}}={\frac {1}{4\pi \varepsilon _{0}}}{\frac {q_{1}q_{2}}{r^{2}}}}

Here, q1 and q2 are the charges, r is the distance between their centres, and the value of the constant fraction 1/(4πε0) is approximately 9×109 N⋅m2⋅C−2. Likewise, ε0 appears in Maxwell's equations, which describe the properties of electric and magnetic fields and electromagnetic radiation, and relate them to their sources. In electrical engineering, ε0 itself is used as a unit to quantify the permittivity of various dielectric materials.

Value

The value of ε0 obeys the formula

ε

0

=

1

μ

0

c

2

{\displaystyle \varepsilon _{0}={\frac {1}{\mu _{0}c^{2}}}}

where c is the defined value for the speed of light in classical vacuum in SI units, and μ0 is the parameter that international standards organizations refer to as the magnetic constant (also called vacuum permeability or the permeability of free space). Since μ0 has an approximate value of 4π × 10−7 H/m (by the former definition of the ampere), and c has the defined value 299792458 m/s, it follows that ε0 can be expressed numerically as

ε

0

1

(

4

π

×

10

7

N

/

A

2

)

(

299

792

458

m

/

s

)

2

8.854

187

8176

×

10

12

F

/

m

.

{\displaystyle \varepsilon _{0}\approx {\frac {1}{\left(4\pi \times {10}^{-7}\,\mathrm {N/A^{2}} \right){\left(299\,792\,458\,\mathrm {m/s} \right)}^{2}}}\approx {8.854\,187\,8176}\times {10}^{-12}\,\mathrm {F/m} .}

The relative deviation of the recommended measured value (1.3×10−10 or 0.13 parts per billion) from the former defined value is within its uncertainty (1.6×10−10, in relative terms, or 0.16 parts per billion).

Editorial summary

“Vacuum permittivity” enters the record as physical constant defining the capability of an electric field to permeate a vacuum. Crown Archives preserves that source wording while asking what Vacuum, permittivity and physical can confirm, complicate or overturn.

Editorial reviewA concise reference frame for defining the subject, testing terminology and identifying the institution closest to the evidence. The current 383-word lead offers orientation but no explicit four-digit date, so chronology should not be assumed. The selected authority fields contribute no independent date. Its strongest next move is a source search built around Vacuum, permittivity and physical.
Editorial analysis

Why this record matters

“Vacuum permittivity” is worth following because a concise public description often conceals a longer documentary argument. Here, Vacuum, permittivity and physical provides the most credible route into that argument.

Evidence profile

The citation trail is more important than the brevity of the summary: it shows where individual claims can be examined in context. The source revision retrieved here is dated Jul 28, 2026. The linked authority identifier is Q6158.

Critical limits

A concise general-reference account can conceal disagreements about scope, terminology or the weight assigned to individual sources. The source lead contains qualifying language; that uncertainty should survive quotation, summary and reuse. Authority statements aid reconciliation but still require their own references, qualifiers and ranks to be checked.

How to read it

Use the entry as an orientation point, then follow its citations and revision history. Names, dates and institutional relationships should be checked against the original record.

Best used for
  • Subject orientation
  • Search vocabulary
  • Locating named sources
Verify next

The closest primary source, responsible institution and strongest cited specialist reference.

Three-step research path

  1. Establish the record: confirm the title “Vacuum permittivity”, its source revision and the description used here.
  2. Expand the search: follow Vacuum permittivity primary sources, Vacuum permittivity archive and Vacuum research across catalogues and specialist indexes.
  3. Test the account: compare the strongest cited source with the responsible institution’s current record and note any disagreement.

Questions for further research

  1. Which source most directly establishes the central claim about “Vacuum permittivity”?
  2. Which cited source is closest to the event, object or claim?
  3. Which institution is responsible for the underlying evidence?
Subject index

Search terms from this dossier

Source & attribution

This entry incorporates text from Vacuum permittivity” on English Wikipedia. Contributors are listed in the page history. Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 License. Selected authority identifiers and statements are retrieved from Wikidata under CC0; their references and qualifiers remain part of the verification path.