CACrown ArchivesThe cinema collection
Menu
Research dossier · Arts & Letters

V/H/S: Viral

2014 film by Aaron Scott Moorhead

Manuscripts, fine bindings, an engraving plate and preserved performance ephemera
Arts and lettersInterpretive dossier study · Crown Archives visual atlas
Record originEnglish Wikipedia
Text licenseCC BY-SA 4.0
Source revisionSep 9, 2026
Entity authorityQ17183987
Source-derived summary

V/H/S: Viral is a 2014 American found footage horror anthology film produced by Bloody Disgusting, The Collective and Haxan Films. The sequel to V/H/S/2 (2013), it is the third installment in the V/H/S franchise and features three found footage segments linked together by a fourth frame narrative written and directed by Nacho Vigalondo, Marcel Sarmiento, Gregg Bishop, Justin Benson and Aaron Scott Moorhead. An additional segment was filmed, written and directed by Todd Lincoln, but was cut since it did not fit with the overall theme of the film.

The film was released on demand on October 23, 2014, and made a limited theatrical release in the United States on November 21, 2014. It grossed $82,409 in box office and $295,389 in home sales. A fourth film, V/H/S/94, was released on September 26, 2021.

Plot

The film is presented as an anthology of three short horror films, built into a frame narrative which acts as its own fourth short horror film. Each short film is linked together with the concept of found footage as each segment is from VHS tapes that went viral after being uploaded to social media from Kyle's laptop.

"Vicious Circles" (frame narrative) — Prologue

Directed by Marcel Sarmiento

Written by T.J. Cimfel, David White and Marcel Sarmiento

The frame narrative focuses on Kevin, an amateur videographer who constantly shoots footage of his girlfriend Iris to cope with his abusive grandmother. She claims to enjoy it, but Iris soon grows annoyed with Kevin's obsession with filming her.

Editorial summary

“V/H/S: Viral” enters the record as 2014 film by Aaron Scott Moorhead. Crown Archives preserves that source wording while asking what Viral, film and Aaron can confirm, complicate or overturn.

Editorial reviewA productive route into publication, performance and collection histories when the underlying object or edition remains clearly identified. The current lead gives the account dated anchors—2014, 2013, 2021—that can be checked directly. The authority record carries competing date values—2014-01-01, 2015-02-05—which should remain separate until their references and qualifiers are resolved. Its strongest next move is a source search built around Viral, film and Aaron.
Editorial analysis

Why this record matters

“V/H/S: Viral” is worth following because a concise public description often conceals a longer documentary argument. Here, Viral, film and Aaron provides the most credible route into that argument.

Evidence profile

Object files, edition statements, performance records and contemporary criticism preserve different stages of the work’s history. The source revision retrieved here is dated Sep 9, 2026. The linked authority identifier is Q17183987. 3 of 3 selected statements include explicit references; 1 carry qualifiers and 0 use preferred rank. The first chronological checks are 2014, 2013 and 2021.

Critical limits

Rights, attribution and provenance may remain disputed even when a general reference summary presents a stable account. The lead is largely declarative, so disagreement and counter-evidence require a deliberate search beyond the opening account. Authority statements aid reconciliation but still require their own references, qualifiers and ranks to be checked.

How to read it

Separate the work, its editions or performances, and its later reception. Catalogue records, publication histories and object files often preserve different parts of that story.

Best used for
  • Identifying works and editions
  • Tracing reception history
  • Finding collection records
Verify next

The original object or edition, catalogue raisonné, performance record, rights file and holding institution.

Three-step research path

  1. Establish the record: confirm the title “V/H/S: Viral”, its source revision and the description used here.
  2. Expand the search: follow V/H/S: Viral primary sources, V/H/S: Viral archive and Viral research across catalogues and specialist indexes.
  3. Test the account: compare the strongest cited source with the responsible institution’s current record and note any disagreement.

Questions for further research

  1. Which source most directly establishes the central claim about “V/H/S: Viral”?
  2. Which edition, object, performance or recording is being described?
  3. How did later circulation or interpretation alter the work’s reception?
Subject index

Search terms from this dossier

Source & attribution

This entry incorporates text from V/H/S: Viral” on English Wikipedia. Contributors are listed in the page history. Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 License. Selected authority identifiers and statements are retrieved from Wikidata under CC0; their references and qualifiers remain part of the verification path.