CACrown ArchivesThe cinema collection
Menu
Research dossier · General Reference

List of Boeing B-17 Flying Fortress variants

specific variant model of the B-17 bomber family

Cross-disciplinary reference desk with index cards, atlas, dictionary and catalogue
General referenceInterpretive dossier study · Crown Archives visual atlas
Record originEnglish Wikipedia
Text licenseCC BY-SA 4.0
Source revisionSep 14, 2026
Entity authorityQ4035260
Source-derived summary

The following is an extensive catalogue of the variants and specific unique elements of each variant and/or design stage of the Boeing B-17 Flying Fortress, a heavy bomber used by the United States Army Air Forces and other Allied air forces during World War II.

Boeing Model 299 (B-17)

The Model 299 was the original aircraft built by Boeing to fulfill an August 1934 requirement by the United States Army Air Corps for a bomber capable of carrying 2,000 lb (910 kg) of bombs 2,000 mi (3,200 km) at 200 mph (320 km/h). The 299 was powered by four 750 hp (560 kW) Pratt & Whitney S1EG Hornet radial engines, giving a maximum speed of 236 mph (380 km/h) and a maximum gross weight of 38,053 lb (17,261 kg). It carried a bomb load of up to eight 600 lb (270 kg) bombs, with a defensive armament of five .30 in (7.6 mm) machine guns, with one in a nose turret and one each in dorsal and ventral mounts and two in waist blisters. In 1935, Boeing's Model 299 competed with entries from other aircraft companies at an evaluation at Wright Field near Dayton, Ohio, USA.

On its flight from Seattle, Washington to Wright Field for the competition, the 299 set a nonstop speed record of 252 mph (406 km/h). Though it crashed and burned on takeoff during a demonstration, the crash was due to flight-crew error, when unreleased gust locks prevented flight surfaces from moving, not from any technical flaw in the aircraft. Subsequently, a mandatory pre-flight checklist prior to take-off was required. Despite the crash and its much higher unit cost, the Army Air Corps leaders was impressed by its performance, so Boeing was awarded a development contract. The aircraft has since been referred to as the XB-17, but this designation was not contemporary or official.

Y1B-17 (YB-17)

Though still enthusiastic about the Boeing design, despite it being disqualified from the fly-off contest following the crash of the Model 299 prototype, the Army Air Corps cut its order from 65 service test YB-17s to just 13. On November 20, 1936, the bomber's normal acquisition funding was changed to "F-1", indicating funding outside of normal annual allocations, and the heavy YB-17 bomber was redesignated "Y1B-17", as a result.

Editorial summary

Begin with the source’s own compact description: “List of Boeing B-17 Flying Fortress variants” is specific variant model of the B-17 bomber family. The dossier treats that line as a proposition to test through List, Boeing and B-17, not as a finished interpretation.

Editorial reviewA concise reference frame for defining the subject, testing terminology and identifying the institution closest to the evidence. The current lead gives the account dated anchors—1934, 1935, 1936—that can be checked directly. The selected authority fields contribute no independent date. For this dossier, List, Boeing and B-17 is the immediate research focus.
Editorial analysis

Why this record matters

The phrase “specific variant model of the B-17 bomber family” supplies a clear boundary for inquiry. It also exposes the unanswered questions: who defined that boundary, when it became stable and which sources sit outside it.

Evidence profile

Named sources, stable identifiers and responsible institutions provide the strongest route from overview to verifiable evidence. The source revision retrieved here is dated Sep 14, 2026. The linked authority identifier is Q4035260. None of the 0 selected statements returned an explicit reference. The first chronological checks are 1934, 1935 and 1936.

Critical limits

Overview language is designed for orientation and should not be treated as a substitute for the evidence cited beneath it. The lead is largely declarative, so disagreement and counter-evidence require a deliberate search beyond the opening account. Authority statements aid reconciliation but still require their own references, qualifiers and ranks to be checked.

How to read it

Use the entry as an orientation point, then follow its citations and revision history. Names, dates and institutional relationships should be checked against the original record.

Best used for
  • Subject orientation
  • Search vocabulary
  • Locating named sources
Verify next

The closest primary source, responsible institution and strongest cited specialist reference.

Three-step research path

  1. Establish the record: confirm the title “List of Boeing B-17 Flying Fortress variants”, its source revision and the description used here.
  2. Expand the search: follow List of Boeing B-17 Flying Fortress variants primary sources, List of Boeing B-17 Flying Fortress variants archive and List research across catalogues and specialist indexes.
  3. Test the account: compare the strongest cited source with the responsible institution’s current record and note any disagreement.

Questions for further research

  1. Which source most directly establishes the central claim about “List of Boeing B-17 Flying Fortress variants”?
  2. What terminology or title could unlock a more precise catalogue search?
  3. Which cited source is closest to the event, object or claim?
Subject index

Search terms from this dossier

Source & attribution

This entry incorporates text from List of Boeing B-17 Flying Fortress variants” on English Wikipedia. Contributors are listed in the page history. Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 License. Selected authority identifiers and statements are retrieved from Wikidata under CC0; their references and qualifiers remain part of the verification path.