CACrown ArchivesThe cinema collection
Menu
Research dossier · General Reference

Krogsta Runestone

Runestone in Uppsala Municipality, Sweden

Cross-disciplinary reference desk with index cards, atlas, dictionary and catalogue
General referenceInterpretive dossier study · Crown Archives visual atlas
Record originEnglish Wikipedia
Text licenseCC BY-SA 4.0
Source revisionAug 20, 2023
Entity authorityQ6438770 ↗
Source-derived summary

The Krogsta Runestone is a runestone designated as U 1125 in the Rundata catalog.

The stone is located in Krogsta near Tuna, in Uppsala Municipality, Sweden, in the historic province of Uppland. It was first described by Johannes Bureus in 1594.

Stone

The runestone is granite, 170 centimetres (5 ft 7 in) tall, and dated to 549–725. Four fragments presumed to be associated with the stone surround it. It is located in a former cemetery and was described by Johannes Bureus in 1594 and by Johannes Haquini Rhezelius in his Monumenta Uplandica in the mid-17th century.

Inscription and decoration

Alongside a drawing of a man with outstretched hands, it bears an Elder Futhark inscription, reading ᛗᚹᛊᛇᛖᛁᛃ mwsïeij (uninterpretable). On the right face is an additional ᛊᛇᚨᛁᚾᚨᛉ sïainaz, probably for Proto-Norse stainaz "stone". The inscription has been interpreted as a "spelling lesson", distinguishing vocalic and consonantal forms for the semi-vowels j and w, and as magical.

The drawing has been described as "naively formed"; the man's gesture of upraised arms with fingers outspread has been interpreted as indicating prayer and as warding off danger, and related to figures on bronze horse mounts from the cemetery at Marchélepot and runestone U Fv1946;258 at Fällbro in Täby Municipality, which is dated to c.

Editorial summary

The public source identifies “Krogsta Runestone” as runestone in Uppsala Municipality, Sweden. This brief keeps that definition visible, then builds a research path around Krogsta, Runestone and Uppsala.

Editorial reviewA dependable orientation record for establishing vocabulary, names and a first evidence trail. The current lead gives the account dated anchors—1125, 1594—that can be checked directly. The linked authority record independently contributes the date 0600-01-01. Its value is orientation rather than verdict, with Krogsta, Runestone and Uppsala providing the first useful test.
Editorial analysis

Why this record matters

A short description can identify a subject without explaining its stakes. For “Krogsta Runestone”, the useful work is to connect “runestone in Uppsala Municipality, Sweden” to the records capable of establishing context and consequence.

Evidence profile

The citation trail is more important than the brevity of the summary: it shows where individual claims can be examined in context. The source revision retrieved here is dated Aug 20, 2023. The linked authority identifier is Q6438770. Authority coordinates are 60.030, 18.071. None of the 2 selected statements returned an explicit reference. The first chronological checks are 1125 and 1594.

Critical limits

A concise general-reference account can conceal disagreements about scope, terminology or the weight assigned to individual sources. The lead is largely declarative, so disagreement and counter-evidence require a deliberate search beyond the opening account. Authority statements aid reconciliation but still require their own references, qualifiers and ranks to be checked.

How to read it

Use the entry as an orientation point, then follow its citations and revision history. Names, dates and institutional relationships should be checked against the original record.

Best used for
  • Subject orientation
  • Search vocabulary
  • Locating named sources
Verify next

The closest primary source, responsible institution and strongest cited specialist reference.

Three-step research path

  1. Establish the record: confirm the title “Krogsta Runestone”, its source revision and the description used here.
  2. Expand the search: follow Krogsta Runestone primary sources, Krogsta Runestone archive and Krogsta research across catalogues and specialist indexes.
  3. Test the account: compare the strongest cited source with the responsible institution’s current record and note any disagreement.

Questions for further research

  1. Which source most directly establishes the central claim about “Krogsta Runestone”?
  2. Which institution is responsible for the underlying evidence?
  3. What terminology or title could unlock a more precise catalogue search?
Subject index

Search terms from this dossier

Source & attribution

This entry incorporates text from “Krogsta Runestone” on English Wikipedia. Contributors are listed in the page history. Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 License. Selected authority identifiers and statements are retrieved from Wikidata under CC0; their references and qualifiers remain part of the verification path.