CACrown ArchivesThe cinema collection
Menu
Research dossier · Arts & Letters

Unzipped (film)

1995 film by Douglas Keeve

Manuscripts, fine bindings, an engraving plate and preserved performance ephemera
Arts and lettersInterpretive dossier study · Crown Archives visual atlas
Record originEnglish Wikipedia
Text licenseCC BY-SA 4.0
Source revisionAug 21, 2026
Entity authorityQ3951309 ↗
Source-derived summary

Unzipped is a 1995 American documentary film directed by Douglas Keeve.

Synopsis

It follows fashion designer Isaac Mizrahi, Keeve's then boyfriend, as he plans and ultimately shows his fall 1994 collection. The film put such a rift in their relationship over Mizrahi's depiction that the two broke up over it.

There are appearances by supermodels Cindy Crawford, Naomi Campbell, Linda Evangelista and Kate Moss, as well as many other celebrities and designers from the fashion world and beyond. At the 1995 Sundance Film Festival, it won the Audience Award for U.S. Documentary, tied with Ballot Measure 9.

Critical reception

Janet Maslin of The New York Times gave Unzipped a positive review. Calling the film a "crafty valentine to the fashion world in general and this irrepressible designer in particular", Maslin praised the film's tight structure and found Mizrahi an engaging personality. She concludes that Unzipped is a "smart, spiky documentary".

The film holds a rating of 78% on Rotten Tomatoes from 18 reviews.

Home media

The film was released on LaserDisc in the U.S. by Miramax Home Entertainment on June 3, 1996.

Editorial summary

“Unzipped (film)” enters the record as 1995 film by Douglas Keeve. Crown Archives preserves that source wording while asking what Unzipped, film and Douglas can confirm, complicate or overturn.

Editorial reviewA productive route into publication, performance and collection histories when the underlying object or edition remains clearly identified. The current lead gives the account dated anchors—1995, 1994, 1996—that can be checked directly. The authority record carries competing date values—1995-01-01, 1996-08-08—which should remain separate until their references and qualifiers are resolved. Its strongest next move is a source search built around Unzipped, film and Douglas.
Editorial analysis

Why this record matters

“Unzipped (film)” is worth following because a concise public description often conceals a longer documentary argument. Here, Unzipped, film and Douglas provides the most credible route into that argument.

Evidence profile

Attribution, date and provenance are strongest when supported by the original work, a catalogue record and documented transmission. The source revision retrieved here is dated Aug 21, 2026. The linked authority identifier is Q3951309. 3 of 3 selected statements include explicit references; 1 carry qualifiers and 0 use preferred rank. The first chronological checks are 1995, 1994 and 1996.

Critical limits

Later fame can flatten the distinction between original context, subsequent adaptation and institutional collecting history. The lead is largely declarative, so disagreement and counter-evidence require a deliberate search beyond the opening account. Authority statements aid reconciliation but still require their own references, qualifiers and ranks to be checked.

How to read it

Separate the work, its editions or performances, and its later reception. Catalogue records, publication histories and object files often preserve different parts of that story.

Best used for
  • Identifying works and editions
  • Tracing reception history
  • Finding collection records
Verify next

The original object or edition, catalogue raisonné, performance record, rights file and holding institution.

Three-step research path

  1. Establish the record: confirm the title “Unzipped (film)”, its source revision and the description used here.
  2. Expand the search: follow Unzipped (film) primary sources, Unzipped (film) archive and Unzipped research across catalogues and specialist indexes.
  3. Test the account: compare the strongest cited source with the responsible institution’s current record and note any disagreement.

Questions for further research

  1. Which source most directly establishes the central claim about “Unzipped (film)”?
  2. Which edition, object, performance or recording is being described?
  3. How did later circulation or interpretation alter the work’s reception?
Subject index

Search terms from this dossier

Source & attribution

This entry incorporates text from “Unzipped (film)” on English Wikipedia. Contributors are listed in the page history. Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 License. Selected authority identifiers and statements are retrieved from Wikidata under CC0; their references and qualifiers remain part of the verification path.