Like terms
Terms that have the same variables and powers (in Algebra)

In mathematics, like terms are summands in a sum that differ only by a numerical factor. Like terms can be regrouped by adding their coefficients.
Typically, in a polynomial expression, like terms are those that contain the same variables to the same powers, possibly with different coefficients.
More generally, when some variable are considered as parameters, like terms are defined similarly, but "numerical factors" must be replaced by "factors depending only on the parameters".
For example, when considering a quadratic equation, one considers often the expression
(
x
−
r
)
(
x
−
s
)
,
{\displaystyle (x-r)(x-s),}
where
r
{\displaystyle r}
and
s
{\displaystyle s}
are the roots of the equation and may be considered as parameters. Then, expanding the above product and regrouping the like terms gives
x
2
−
(
r
+
s
)
x
+
r
s
.
{\displaystyle x^{2}-(r+s)x+rs.}
Generalization
In this discussion, a "term" will refer to a string of numbers being multiplied or divided (that division is simply multiplication by a reciprocal) together. Terms are within the same expression and are combined by either addition or subtraction. For example, take the expression:
a
x
+
b
x
{\displaystyle ax+bx}
There are two terms in this expression. Notice that the two terms have a common factor, that is, both terms have an
x
{\displaystyle x}
.
Begin with the source’s own compact description: “Like terms” is terms that have the same variables and powers (in Algebra). The dossier treats that line as a proposition to test through Like, terms and Terms, not as a finished interpretation.
Why this record matters
The phrase “terms that have the same variables and powers (in Algebra)” supplies a clear boundary for inquiry. It also exposes the unanswered questions: who defined that boundary, when it became stable and which sources sit outside it.
The citation trail is more important than the brevity of the summary: it shows where individual claims can be examined in context. The source revision retrieved here is dated Sep 19, 2026. The linked authority identifier is Q5383004. None of the 0 selected statements returned an explicit reference.
A concise general-reference account can conceal disagreements about scope, terminology or the weight assigned to individual sources. The source lead contains qualifying language; that uncertainty should survive quotation, summary and reuse. Authority statements aid reconciliation but still require their own references, qualifiers and ranks to be checked.
How to read it
Use the entry as an orientation point, then follow its citations and revision history. Names, dates and institutional relationships should be checked against the original record.
- Subject orientation
- Search vocabulary
- Locating named sources
The closest primary source, responsible institution and strongest cited specialist reference.
Three-step research path
- Establish the record: confirm the title “Like terms”, its source revision and the description used here.
- Expand the search: follow Like terms primary sources, Like terms archive and Like research across catalogues and specialist indexes.
- Test the account: compare the strongest cited source with the responsible institution’s current record and note any disagreement.
Questions for further research
- Which source most directly establishes the central claim about “Like terms”?
- Which institution is responsible for the underlying evidence?
- Which cited source is closest to the event, object or claim?
Search terms from this dossier
This entry incorporates text from “Like terms” on English Wikipedia. Contributors are listed in the page history. Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 License. Selected authority identifiers and statements are retrieved from Wikidata under CC0; their references and qualifiers remain part of the verification path.