CACrown ArchivesThe cinema collection
EN/FR
Search
Menu
Research dossier · History & Society

ARCIS University

Chilean private university

Layered newspapers, civic records and oral-history reels arranged as chronological evidence
History and societyInterpretive dossier study · Crown Archives visual atlas
Record originEnglish Wikipedia
Text licenseCC BY-SA 4.0
Source revisionJul 3, 2026
Entity authorityQ7895089 ↗
Source-derived summary

University of Art & Social Sciences (Spanish: Universidad de Arte y Ciencias Sociales - UARCIS) was a private university in Chile. It was founded on 1982 and the headquarters were in Santiago de Chile.

Editorial summary

The public source identifies “ARCIS University” as chilean private university. This brief keeps that definition visible, then builds a research path around ARCIS, University and Chilean.

Editorial reviewA strong contextual entry point for chronology, institutions and public events when official records are distinguished from later interpretation. The current lead gives the account dated anchors—1982—that can be checked directly. The linked authority record independently contributes the date 1982. Its value is orientation rather than verdict, with ARCIS, University and Chilean providing the first useful test.
Editorial analysis

Why this record matters

A short description can identify a subject without explaining its stakes. For “ARCIS University”, the useful work is to connect “chilean private university” to the records capable of establishing context and consequence.

Evidence profile

Chronology, provenance and viewpoint should be read together before a broad social or political interpretation is accepted. The source revision retrieved here is dated Jul 3, 2026. The linked authority identifier is Q7895089. VIAF identifies the subject as 142195176. The Library of Congress control number is no96018647. Authority coordinates are -33.446, -70.673. 3 of 5 selected statements include explicit references; 0 carry qualifiers and 0 use preferred rank. The first chronological checks are 1982.

Critical limits

Official terminology may obscure informal participation, dissent or communities documented only indirectly. The lead is largely declarative, so disagreement and counter-evidence require a deliberate search beyond the opening account. Authority statements aid reconciliation but still require their own references, qualifiers and ranks to be checked.

How to read it

Compare institutional narratives with records created by participants and affected communities. Dates and formal titles are useful anchors, but not substitutes for context.

Best used for
  • Event chronology
  • Institutional context
  • Locating named record creators
Verify next

Contemporary correspondence, government or organizational records, oral histories and cited historical scholarship.

Three-step research path

  1. Establish the record: confirm the title “ARCIS University”, its source revision and the description used here.
  2. Expand the search: follow ARCIS University primary sources, ARCIS University archive and ARCIS research across catalogues and specialist indexes.
  3. Test the account: compare the strongest cited source with the responsible institution’s current record and note any disagreement.

Questions for further research

  1. Which source most directly establishes the central claim about “ARCIS University”?
  2. Which voices are present, absent or mediated by the institution?
  3. What chronology connects this entry to wider political or social change?
Subject index

Search terms from this dossier

Source & attribution

This entry incorporates text from “ARCIS University” on English Wikipedia. Contributors are listed in the page history. Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 License. Selected authority identifiers and statements are retrieved from Wikidata under CC0; their references and qualifiers remain part of the verification path.