CACrown ArchivesThe cinema collection
Menu
Research dossier · History & Society

Universities Federation for Animal Welfare

organization

Layered newspapers, civic records and oral-history reels arranged as chronological evidence
History and societyInterpretive dossier study · Crown Archives visual atlas
Record originEnglish Wikipedia
Text licenseCC BY-SA 4.0
Source revisionSep 21, 2026
Entity authorityQ17101323 ↗
Source-derived summary

The Universities Federation for Animal Welfare (UFAW) is an animal welfare science society. It is a UK-registered scientific and educational charity.

UFAW works to improve animals' lives by promoting and supporting developments in the science and technology that underpin advances in animal welfare. It organises symposia, conferences and meetings, and publishes books, videos, technical reports and the quarterly peer-reviewed scientific journal Animal Welfare. Its work has primarily been funded by donations, subscriptions and legacies.

Research and education grants and awards

UFAW has supported a wide range of project types, through the following:

Hume Animal Welfare Research Fellowships

Research Training Scholarships

Animal Welfare Student Scholarships

Small Project and Travel Awards

Research and Project Awards

UFAW 3Rs Liaison Group Research Studentships

History

In 1926, the University of London Animal Welfare Society (ULAWS) was founded by Major Charles Hume. As its support base amongst academic institutions grew and as more institutions and people learned of and championed the scientific approach to animal problems that ULAWS stood for, the name of the society was changed, in 1938, to the Universities Federation for Animal Welfare (UFAW).

UFAW's aims were:

To enlist the influence of university men and women on behalf of animals, wild and domestic;

To promote, by educational and other methods, interest in the welfare of animals in Great Britain and abroad;

To lessen, by methods appropriate to the special character of a university organisation, the pain and fear inflicted on animals by man;

To obtain and disseminate accurate information relating to animal welfare;

To further and promote legislation for the protection of animals.

UFAW advocates the humane control of wild animals and in 1932 held a meeting on humane methods of trapping rabbits which led to their 1934 book publication "Man versus Rabbit" by A. H. B. Kirkman. The book raised awareness about the cruelty of the leg-hold trap and humane alternatives.

Editorial summary

“Universities Federation for Animal Welfare” enters the record as organization. Crown Archives preserves that source wording while asking what Universities, Federation and Animal can confirm, complicate or overturn.

Editorial reviewA useful synthesis for locating the documentary relationships between formal authority, participants and affected communities. The current lead gives the account dated anchors—1926, 1938, 1932, 1934—that can be checked directly. The linked authority record independently contributes the date 1926. Its strongest next move is a source search built around Universities, Federation and Animal.
Editorial analysis

Why this record matters

“Universities Federation for Animal Welfare” is worth following because a concise public description often conceals a longer documentary argument. Here, Universities, Federation and Animal provides the most credible route into that argument.

Evidence profile

Chronology, provenance and viewpoint should be read together before a broad social or political interpretation is accepted. The source revision retrieved here is dated Sep 21, 2026. The linked authority identifier is Q17101323. VIAF identifies the subject as 147817683. The Library of Congress control number is n50082374. 4 of 6 selected statements include explicit references; 2 carry qualifiers and 2 use preferred rank. The first chronological checks are 1926, 1938, 1932 and 1934.

Critical limits

Later summaries often reconcile disputed chronology or motive more neatly than the contemporary record permits. The lead is largely declarative, so disagreement and counter-evidence require a deliberate search beyond the opening account. Authority statements aid reconciliation but still require their own references, qualifiers and ranks to be checked.

How to read it

Compare institutional narratives with records created by participants and affected communities. Dates and formal titles are useful anchors, but not substitutes for context.

Best used for
  • Event chronology
  • Institutional context
  • Locating named record creators
Verify next

Contemporary correspondence, government or organizational records, oral histories and cited historical scholarship.

Three-step research path

  1. Establish the record: confirm the title “Universities Federation for Animal Welfare”, its source revision and the description used here.
  2. Expand the search: follow Universities Federation for Animal Welfare primary sources, Universities Federation for Animal Welfare archive and Universities research across catalogues and specialist indexes.
  3. Test the account: compare the strongest cited source with the responsible institution’s current record and note any disagreement.

Questions for further research

  1. Which source most directly establishes the central claim about “Universities Federation for Animal Welfare”?
  2. Which voices are present, absent or mediated by the institution?
  3. What chronology connects this entry to wider political or social change?
Subject index

Search terms from this dossier

Source & attribution

This entry incorporates text from “Universities Federation for Animal Welfare” on English Wikipedia. Contributors are listed in the page history. Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 License. Selected authority identifiers and statements are retrieved from Wikidata under CC0; their references and qualifiers remain part of the verification path.