CACrown ArchivesThe cinema collection
EN/FR
Search
Menu
Research dossier · General Reference

Universal Code of Conduct on Holy Sites

Open-knowledge reference entry

Cross-disciplinary reference desk with index cards, atlas, dictionary and catalogue
General referenceInterpretive dossier study · Crown Archives visual atlas
Record originEnglish Wikipedia
Text licenseCC BY-SA 4.0
Source revisionSep 5, 2026
Entity authorityQ136871814 ↗
Source-derived summary

The Universal Code of Conduct on Holy Sites is an open standard for religious heritage and sacred natural sites safeguard developed by the Search for Common Ground and the Oslo Center for Peace and Human Rights. Its authoritative status as an international law policy is stated by its dozens of international religious leaderships from various traditions endorsements along its acceptance by the United Nations.

Editorial summary

The public source identifies “Universal Code of Conduct on Holy Sites” as open-knowledge reference entry. This brief keeps that definition visible, then builds a research path around Universal, Code and Conduct.

Editorial reviewA concise reference frame for defining the subject, testing terminology and identifying the institution closest to the evidence. The current 64-word lead offers orientation but no explicit four-digit date, so chronology should not be assumed. The selected authority fields contribute no independent date. Its value is orientation rather than verdict, with Universal, Code and Conduct providing the first useful test.
Editorial analysis

Why this record matters

A short description can identify a subject without explaining its stakes. For “Universal Code of Conduct on Holy Sites”, the useful work is to connect “open-knowledge reference entry” to the records capable of establishing context and consequence.

Evidence profile

Named sources, stable identifiers and responsible institutions provide the strongest route from overview to verifiable evidence. The source revision retrieved here is dated Sep 5, 2026. The linked authority identifier is Q136871814. None of the 0 selected statements returned an explicit reference.

Critical limits

The absence of detail may reflect summary conventions rather than a lack of surviving documentation. The lead is largely declarative, so disagreement and counter-evidence require a deliberate search beyond the opening account. Authority statements aid reconciliation but still require their own references, qualifiers and ranks to be checked.

How to read it

Use the entry as an orientation point, then follow its citations and revision history. Names, dates and institutional relationships should be checked against the original record.

Best used for
  • Subject orientation
  • Search vocabulary
  • Locating named sources
Verify next

The closest primary source, responsible institution and strongest cited specialist reference.

Three-step research path

  1. Establish the record: confirm the title “Universal Code of Conduct on Holy Sites”, its source revision and the description used here.
  2. Expand the search: follow Universal Code of Conduct on Holy Sites primary sources, Universal Code of Conduct on Holy Sites archive and Universal research across catalogues and specialist indexes.
  3. Test the account: compare the strongest cited source with the responsible institution’s current record and note any disagreement.

Questions for further research

  1. Which source most directly establishes the central claim about “Universal Code of Conduct on Holy Sites”?
  2. What terminology or title could unlock a more precise catalogue search?
  3. Which institution is responsible for the underlying evidence?
Subject index

Search terms from this dossier

Source & attribution

This entry incorporates text from “Universal Code of Conduct on Holy Sites” on English Wikipedia. Contributors are listed in the page history. Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 License. Selected authority identifiers and statements are retrieved from Wikidata under CC0; their references and qualifiers remain part of the verification path.