CACrown ArchivesThe cinema collection
Menu
Research dossier · Places & Architecture

United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit

United States Appellate Court reviewing district court cases from Georgia, Alabama, and Florida

Architectural plans, a scale model, maps and brass measuring instruments
Places and architectureInterpretive dossier study · Crown Archives visual atlas
Record originEnglish Wikipedia
Text licenseCC BY-SA 4.0
Source revisionSep 12, 2026
Entity authorityQ250446 ↗
Source-derived summary

The United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit (in case citations, 11th Cir.) is a federal appellate court over the following U.S. district courts:

Middle District of Alabama

Northern District of Alabama

Southern District of Alabama

Middle District of Florida

Northern District of Florida

Southern District of Florida

Middle District of Georgia

Northern District of Georgia

Southern District of Georgia

These districts were originally part of the Fifth Circuit, but were split off to form the Eleventh Circuit on October 1, 1981. For this reason, Fifth Circuit decisions from before this split are considered binding precedent in the Eleventh Circuit.

The court is based at the Elbert P. Tuttle U.S. Court of Appeals Building in Atlanta, Georgia. The building is named for Elbert Tuttle, who served as Chief Judge of the Fifth Circuit in the 1960s and was known for issuing decisions which advanced the civil rights of African-Americans.

The Eleventh Circuit is one of the 13 United States courts of appeals.

Creation of the Eleventh Circuit

The Eleventh Circuit Court of Appeals was created in 1981. The decision to create a new Eleventh Circuit Court of Appeals was contentious, with the debate over the reorganization of the Fifth Circuit lasting nearly two decades. The question of creating a new circuit first arose in the early 1960s as the Southern states contained within the Fifth Circuit underwent major changes including rapid population growth and regional industrialization and specialization. Both of these factors led to an increase in the Fifth Circuit's caseload, necessitating the addition of more judges to the Court.During this time, the Fifth Circuit also became known for their jurisprudence on cases pertaining to desegregation and voting rights for African Americans. This led to opposition from groups who believed the Fifth Circuit judges were inappropriately utilising judicial activism to advance civil rights.

Editorial summary

The public source identifies “United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit” as united States Appellate Court reviewing district court cases from Georgia, Alabama, and Florida. This brief keeps that definition visible, then builds a research path around United, States and Court.

Editorial reviewA strong orientation record where physical form, institutional use and historical geography need to be read together. The current lead gives the account dated anchors—1981—that can be checked directly. The selected authority fields contribute no independent date. Its value is orientation rather than verdict, with United, States and Court providing the first useful test.
Editorial analysis

Why this record matters

A short description can identify a subject without explaining its stakes. For “United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit”, the useful work is to connect “united States Appellate Court reviewing district court cases from Georgia, Alabama, and Florida” to the records capable of establishing context and consequence.

Evidence profile

Place names and jurisdictional language are key evidence: both can reveal earlier catalogue descriptions and overlooked record series. The source revision retrieved here is dated Sep 12, 2026. The linked authority identifier is Q250446. The Library of Congress control number is n84097867. Authority coordinates are 33.756, -84.390. 2 of 2 selected statements include explicit references; 0 carry qualifiers and 0 use preferred rank. The first chronological checks are 1981.

Critical limits

Modern boundaries and familiar names can conceal earlier jurisdictions or structures that do not align with the present site. The lead is largely declarative, so disagreement and counter-evidence require a deliberate search beyond the opening account. Authority statements aid reconciliation but still require their own references, qualifiers and ranks to be checked.

How to read it

Treat names, boundaries and functions as historically changeable. Maps, plans, inventories and administrative records can clarify what the place meant at different dates.

Best used for
  • Historic place names
  • Jurisdictional context
  • Routes into maps and plans
Verify next

Contemporary maps, plans, listed-building records, estate papers and the responsible local or national archive.

Three-step research path

  1. Establish the record: confirm the title “United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit”, its source revision and the description used here.
  2. Expand the search: follow United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit primary sources, United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit archive and United research across catalogues and specialist indexes.
  3. Test the account: compare the strongest cited source with the responsible institution’s current record and note any disagreement.

Questions for further research

  1. Which source most directly establishes the central claim about “United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit”?
  2. What physical evidence or contemporary plan supports the description?
  3. Which earlier names or jurisdictions may reveal additional records?
Subject index

Search terms from this dossier

Source & attribution

This entry incorporates text from “United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit” on English Wikipedia. Contributors are listed in the page history. Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 License. Selected authority identifiers and statements are retrieved from Wikidata under CC0; their references and qualifiers remain part of the verification path.