CACrown ArchivesThe cinema collection
Menu
Research dossier · History & Society

Copyright law of the United Kingdom

law

Layered newspapers, civic records and oral-history reels arranged as chronological evidence
History and societyInterpretive dossier study · Crown Archives visual atlas
Record originEnglish Wikipedia
Text licenseCC BY-SA 4.0
Source revisionSep 17, 2026
Entity authorityQ5169279 ↗
Source-derived summary

Under the law of the United Kingdom, a copyright is an intangible property right subsisting in certain qualifying subject matter. Copyright law is governed by the Copyright, Designs and Patents Act 1988 (the 1988 Act), as amended from time to time. On 12 September 2018, the European Parliament approved new copyright rules to help secure the rights of writers and musicians, although since then, the UK has left the EU.

Background

Copyright protection in Britain dates back to the 1556 Charter of the Worshipful Company of Stationers and Newspaper Makers.

The Licensing of the Press Act 1662 gave publishers exclusive printing rights, but did not give any rights to authors.

Parliament failed to renew the Act in 1694, primarily to remove monopoly and encourage a free press.

The modern concept of copyright originated in Great Britain, in the year 1710, with the Statute of Anne. This Act prescribed a copyright term of fourteen years, and let the author renew for another fourteen years, after which the work went into the public domain. Over the years, additional acts and case law steadily refined the definitions of what could be protected, including derivative works, and the degree of protection given. Under the Copyright Act 1842 the copyright period lasted for the lifetime of the author plus 7 years, or for 42 years from first publication, whichever was longer.

The Copyright Act 1911 (1 & 2 Geo.

Editorial summary

“Copyright law of the United Kingdom” enters the record as law. Crown Archives preserves that source wording while asking what Copyright, United and Kingdom can confirm, complicate or overturn.

Editorial reviewA strong contextual entry point for chronology, institutions and public events when official records are distinguished from later interpretation. The current lead gives the account dated anchors—1988, 2018, 1556, 1662—that can be checked directly. The selected authority fields contribute no independent date. Its strongest next move is a source search built around Copyright, United and Kingdom.
Editorial analysis

Why this record matters

“Copyright law of the United Kingdom” is worth following because a concise public description often conceals a longer documentary argument. Here, Copyright, United and Kingdom provides the most credible route into that argument.

Evidence profile

Contemporary correspondence, administrative files and participant testimony can test how later narratives organized the event or institution. The source revision retrieved here is dated Sep 17, 2026. The linked authority identifier is Q5169279. The Library of Congress control number is sh2008101747. 1 of 1 selected statements include explicit references; 0 carry qualifiers and 0 use preferred rank. The first chronological checks are 1988, 2018, 1556 and 1662.

Critical limits

Institutional narratives can privilege the records that survived while minimizing voices that were never formally collected. The source lead contains qualifying language; that uncertainty should survive quotation, summary and reuse. Authority statements aid reconciliation but still require their own references, qualifiers and ranks to be checked.

How to read it

Compare institutional narratives with records created by participants and affected communities. Dates and formal titles are useful anchors, but not substitutes for context.

Best used for
  • Event chronology
  • Institutional context
  • Locating named record creators
Verify next

Contemporary correspondence, government or organizational records, oral histories and cited historical scholarship.

Three-step research path

  1. Establish the record: confirm the title “Copyright law of the United Kingdom”, its source revision and the description used here.
  2. Expand the search: follow Copyright law of the United Kingdom primary sources, Copyright law of the United Kingdom archive and Copyright research across catalogues and specialist indexes.
  3. Test the account: compare the strongest cited source with the responsible institution’s current record and note any disagreement.

Questions for further research

  1. Which source most directly establishes the central claim about “Copyright law of the United Kingdom”?
  2. What chronology connects this entry to wider political or social change?
  3. Which voices are present, absent or mediated by the institution?
Subject index

Search terms from this dossier

Source & attribution

This entry incorporates text from “Copyright law of the United Kingdom” on English Wikipedia. Contributors are listed in the page history. Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 License. Selected authority identifiers and statements are retrieved from Wikidata under CC0; their references and qualifiers remain part of the verification path.