CACrown ArchivesThe cinema collection
Menu
Research dossier · General Reference

Umm Shareek

companion of Muhammad

Cross-disciplinary reference desk with index cards, atlas, dictionary and catalogue
General referenceInterpretive dossier study · Crown Archives visual atlas
Record originEnglish Wikipedia
Text licenseCC BY-SA 4.0
Source revisionSep 17, 2026
Entity authorityQ1113001 ↗
Source-derived summary

Ghuzayyah bint Jabir ibn Hakeem (Arabic: غزية بنت جابر بن حكيم), also known honorifically as Umm Shareek (Arabic: أم شريك, ), was a female disciple (known as the Sahaba) of the Islamic prophet Muhammad.

Biography

As Islam was revealed in the 620s, the ruling class of Mecca, the Quraysh, used to torture new converts to Islam in order to have them renounce their new faith. Umm Shareek, a woman who converted, was made to stand under the hot sun for three days and was not allowed to drink water.

Editorial summary

This brief starts where responsible research should: with the source description of “Umm Shareek” as companion of Muhammad. Everything that follows is an evidence route, not borrowed authority.

Editorial reviewA practical starting point whose main value is the path it opens into stronger specialist and primary sources. The current 89-word lead offers orientation but no explicit four-digit date, so chronology should not be assumed. The selected authority fields contribute no independent date. The account is most persuasive where Shareek, companion and Muhammad can be independently traced.
Editorial analysis

Why this record matters

The subject matters to the general reference register because the source frames it as companion of Muhammad. Its deeper value depends on whether names, dates, institutions and citations support that framing.

Evidence profile

Vocabulary and entity names are the principal evidence signals here, because they determine the precision of every later search. The source revision retrieved here is dated Sep 17, 2026. The linked authority identifier is Q1113001. None of the 0 selected statements returned an explicit reference.

Critical limits

The absence of detail may reflect summary conventions rather than a lack of surviving documentation. The lead is largely declarative, so disagreement and counter-evidence require a deliberate search beyond the opening account. Authority statements aid reconciliation but still require their own references, qualifiers and ranks to be checked.

How to read it

Use the entry as an orientation point, then follow its citations and revision history. Names, dates and institutional relationships should be checked against the original record.

Best used for
  • Subject orientation
  • Search vocabulary
  • Locating named sources
Verify next

The closest primary source, responsible institution and strongest cited specialist reference.

Three-step research path

  1. Establish the record: confirm the title “Umm Shareek”, its source revision and the description used here.
  2. Expand the search: follow Umm Shareek primary sources, Umm Shareek archive and Shareek research across catalogues and specialist indexes.
  3. Test the account: compare the strongest cited source with the responsible institution’s current record and note any disagreement.

Questions for further research

  1. Which source most directly establishes the central claim about “Umm Shareek”?
  2. Which cited source is closest to the event, object or claim?
  3. What terminology or title could unlock a more precise catalogue search?
Subject index

Search terms from this dossier

Source & attribution

This entry incorporates text from “Umm Shareek” on English Wikipedia. Contributors are listed in the page history. Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 License. Selected authority identifiers and statements are retrieved from Wikidata under CC0; their references and qualifiers remain part of the verification path.