CACrown ArchivesThe cinema collection
Menu
Research dossier · Science & Nature

Umbilicaria torrefacta

species of fungus

Specimen drawers, botanical folios and brass scientific instruments under study light
Science and natureInterpretive dossier study · Crown Archives visual atlas
Record originEnglish Wikipedia
Text licenseCC BY-SA 4.0
Source revisionApr 14, 2026
Entity authorityQ10667752 ↗
Source-derived summary

Umbilicaria torrefacta is a species of saxicolous (rock-dwelling), foliose lichen in the family Umbilicariaceae. It is an arctic-alpine species with a circumpolar distribution and is widely distributed within the Holarctic realm, specifically within the Palearctic and Neoarctic biogeographical regions. Characteristic features of Umbilicaria torrefacta include the lace-like fringe in its lobes and the plates on the underside of the thallus. One common name, punctured rock-tripe, refers to the distinctive sieve-like perforations on the thallus margins.

The species was scientifically described in 1777 by John Lightfoot and later classified under the genus Umbilicaria by Heinrich Schrader in 1794. Because of its somewhat variable morphology, this species has often been misidentified historically and described under different names, resulting in an extensive synonymy. In 2017, a lectotype specimen was designated for the species, clarifying its taxonomic status. Molecular phylogenetics studies have revealed complex relationships within the family Umbilicariaceae, resulting in the revision of the genus Umbilicaria. U. torrefacta is a member of Gyrophora, a subgenus characterised by species with circular ridges on the discs of their apothecia; rigid, non-pustulate thalli; and specific secondary metabolites, such as gyrophoric acid and stictic acid.

Umbilicaria torrefacta has distinct spectral properties, transmitting very little light and significantly altering the spectral signature of rock surfaces.

Editorial summary

The public source identifies “Umbilicaria torrefacta” as species of fungus. This brief keeps that definition visible, then builds a research path around Umbilicaria, torrefacta and species.

Editorial reviewA practical orientation to terminology and classification, particularly when read beside dated observations, specimens or technical literature. The current lead gives the account dated anchors—1777, 1794, 2017—that can be checked directly. The selected authority fields contribute no independent date. Its value is orientation rather than verdict, with Umbilicaria, torrefacta and species providing the first useful test.
Editorial analysis

Why this record matters

A short description can identify a subject without explaining its stakes. For “Umbilicaria torrefacta”, the useful work is to connect “species of fungus” to the records capable of establishing context and consequence.

Evidence profile

The date and method of observation matter as much as the stated conclusion, especially where classification or consensus has changed. The source revision retrieved here is dated Apr 14, 2026. The linked authority identifier is Q10667752. None of the 0 selected statements returned an explicit reference. The first chronological checks are 1777, 1794 and 2017.

Critical limits

A general summary may omit uncertainty, sample limits or methodological disagreement that is explicit in the technical record. The lead is largely declarative, so disagreement and counter-evidence require a deliberate search beyond the opening account. Authority statements aid reconciliation but still require their own references, qualifiers and ranks to be checked.

How to read it

Check terminology, classification and the date of the cited evidence. Scientific names and technical consensus can change while older records retain historical value.

Best used for
  • Current terminology
  • Classification context
  • Finding cited technical literature
Verify next

Primary datasets, specimen catalogues, standards bodies and the most recent peer-reviewed literature.

Three-step research path

  1. Establish the record: confirm the title “Umbilicaria torrefacta”, its source revision and the description used here.
  2. Expand the search: follow Umbilicaria torrefacta primary sources, Umbilicaria torrefacta archive and Umbilicaria research across catalogues and specialist indexes.
  3. Test the account: compare the strongest cited source with the responsible institution’s current record and note any disagreement.

Questions for further research

  1. Which source most directly establishes the central claim about “Umbilicaria torrefacta”?
  2. Which observation, specimen, dataset or publication supports the account?
  3. Has classification or technical consensus changed since the cited source?
Subject index

Search terms from this dossier

Source & attribution

This entry incorporates text from “Umbilicaria torrefacta” on English Wikipedia. Contributors are listed in the page history. Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 License. Selected authority identifiers and statements are retrieved from Wikidata under CC0; their references and qualifiers remain part of the verification path.