CACrown ArchivesThe cinema collection
EN/FR
Search
Menu
Research dossier · General Reference

Uliana Nigmatullina

Russian biathlete

Cross-disciplinary reference desk with index cards, atlas, dictionary and catalogue
General referenceInterpretive dossier study · Crown Archives visual atlas
Record originEnglish Wikipedia
Text licenseCC BY-SA 4.0
Source revisionJul 14, 2026
Entity authorityQ4208775 ↗
Source-derived summary

Uliana Nikolayevna Nigmatullina (née Kaisheva, Russian: Ульяна Николаевна Нигматуллина (Кайшева); born 8 March 1994) is a Russian biathlete. She is the only biathlete to win the four gold medals (individual, sprint, pursuit and relay) at the Youth World Championships, which she accomplished in 2013. She competed in the 2018 Winter Olympics.

Biathlon results

All results are sourced from the International Biathlon Union.

Editorial summary

“Uliana Nigmatullina” enters the record as russian biathlete. Crown Archives preserves that source wording while asking what Uliana, Nigmatullina and Russian can confirm, complicate or overturn.

Editorial reviewA concise reference frame for defining the subject, testing terminology and identifying the institution closest to the evidence. The current lead gives the account dated anchors—1994, 2013, 2018—that can be checked directly. The selected authority fields contribute no independent date. Its strongest next move is a source search built around Uliana, Nigmatullina and Russian.
Editorial analysis

Why this record matters

“Uliana Nigmatullina” is worth following because a concise public description often conceals a longer documentary argument. Here, Uliana, Nigmatullina and Russian provides the most credible route into that argument.

Evidence profile

Named sources, stable identifiers and responsible institutions provide the strongest route from overview to verifiable evidence. The source revision retrieved here is dated Jul 14, 2026. The linked authority identifier is Q4208775. The first chronological checks are 1994, 2013 and 2018.

Critical limits

A concise general-reference account can conceal disagreements about scope, terminology or the weight assigned to individual sources. The lead is largely declarative, so disagreement and counter-evidence require a deliberate search beyond the opening account. Authority statements aid reconciliation but still require their own references, qualifiers and ranks to be checked.

How to read it

Use the entry as an orientation point, then follow its citations and revision history. Names, dates and institutional relationships should be checked against the original record.

Best used for
  • Subject orientation
  • Search vocabulary
  • Locating named sources
Verify next

The closest primary source, responsible institution and strongest cited specialist reference.

Three-step research path

  1. Establish the record: confirm the title “Uliana Nigmatullina”, its source revision and the description used here.
  2. Expand the search: follow Uliana Nigmatullina primary sources, Uliana Nigmatullina archive and Uliana research across catalogues and specialist indexes.
  3. Test the account: compare the strongest cited source with the responsible institution’s current record and note any disagreement.

Questions for further research

  1. Which source most directly establishes the central claim about “Uliana Nigmatullina”?
  2. Which cited source is closest to the event, object or claim?
  3. Which institution is responsible for the underlying evidence?
Subject index

Search terms from this dossier

Source & attribution

This entry incorporates text from “Uliana Nigmatullina” on English Wikipedia. Contributors are listed in the page history. Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 License. Selected authority identifiers and statements are retrieved from Wikidata under CC0; their references and qualifiers remain part of the verification path.