CACrown ArchivesThe cinema collection
Menu
Research dossier · People & Ideas

Ufuk Akcigit

Turkish economist (born 1980)

Correspondence, annotated notebooks and portrait silhouettes prepared for research
People and ideasInterpretive dossier study · Crown Archives visual atlas
Record originEnglish Wikipedia
Text licenseCC BY-SA 4.0
Source revisionMay 14, 2026
Entity authorityQ83257098
Source-derived summary

Ufuk Akcigit (born 23 May 1980) is a Turkish economist. In 2020, he was named the Arnold C. Harberger Professor of Economics at the University of Chicago, the Kenneth C. Griffin Department of Economics. His research concentrates on economic growth and development, and uses an interdisciplinary approach blending micro and macro economic concepts to examine the intersection of policy and innovation.

His work has been widely published in the top economic journals and has been recognized by a number of awards and honors within the field of economics.

Early life and education

Ufuk Akcigit was born to Turkish parents in Germany. He lived in Germany until he was four years old and his parents relocated to their hometown of Bursa.

He was interested in Mathematics and Economics from an early age and completed middle and high school at Ankara Anatolian High School. In 2003, he obtained his bachelor's degree in economics from Koç University after which, he pursued his doctoral studies at the economics department of Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT). He earned a Ph.D. degree in 2009 with his dissertation: Essays on growth and innovation policies.

His thesis adviser was Daron Acemoğlu, with whom he has since collaborated.

Editorial summary

“Ufuk Akcigit” enters the record as turkish economist (born 1980). Crown Archives preserves that source wording while asking what Ufuk, Akcigit and Turkish can confirm, complicate or overturn.

Editorial reviewStrongest as a route into the people, institutions and dated events that shaped the subject’s public record. The current lead gives the account dated anchors—1980, 2020, 2003, 2009—that can be checked directly. The linked authority record independently contributes the date 1980-05-23. Its strongest next move is a source search built around Ufuk, Akcigit and Turkish.
Editorial analysis

Why this record matters

“Ufuk Akcigit” is worth following because a concise public description often conceals a longer documentary argument. Here, Ufuk, Akcigit and Turkish provides the most credible route into that argument.

Evidence profile

The entry’s evidential value lies in the named roles, institutions and publications that can be tested against primary documentation. The source revision retrieved here is dated May 14, 2026. The linked authority identifier is Q83257098. VIAF identifies the subject as 47933228. The Library of Congress control number is no2007002045. None of the 3 selected statements returned an explicit reference. The first chronological checks are 1980, 2020, 2003 and 2009.

Critical limits

Later biographies can compress uncertainty and repeat inherited reputations, so apparently settled claims may still require comparison. The source lead contains qualifying language; that uncertainty should survive quotation, summary and reuse. Authority statements aid reconciliation but still require their own references, qualifiers and ranks to be checked.

How to read it

Read biographical claims against dates, named institutions and the cited references. Distinguish a subject’s later reputation from evidence produced during their lifetime.

Best used for
  • Establishing names and roles
  • Building a first chronology
  • Locating cited institutions
Verify next

Personal papers, civil or court records, institutional files and the scholarship cited by the source.

Three-step research path

  1. Establish the record: confirm the title “Ufuk Akcigit”, its source revision and the description used here.
  2. Expand the search: follow Ufuk Akcigit primary sources, Ufuk Akcigit archive and Ufuk research across catalogues and specialist indexes.
  3. Test the account: compare the strongest cited source with the responsible institution’s current record and note any disagreement.

Questions for further research

  1. Which source most directly establishes the central claim about “Ufuk Akcigit”?
  2. Which primary records establish identity, chronology and institutional ties?
  3. Which claims depend on a single source or contested interpretation?
Subject index

Search terms from this dossier

Source & attribution

This entry incorporates text from Ufuk Akcigit” on English Wikipedia. Contributors are listed in the page history. Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 License. Selected authority identifiers and statements are retrieved from Wikidata under CC0; their references and qualifiers remain part of the verification path.