CACrown ArchivesThe cinema collection
Menu
Research dossier · Science & Nature

Udanoceratops

genus of reptiles (fossil)

Specimen drawers, botanical folios and brass scientific instruments under study light
Science and natureInterpretive dossier study · Crown Archives visual atlas
Record originEnglish Wikipedia
Text licenseCC BY-SA 4.0
Source revisionSep 26, 2026
Entity authorityQ132581 ↗
Source-derived summary

Udanoceratops (meaning "Udan-Sayr horned face") is a genus of large leptoceratopsid dinosaur that lived during the Late Cretaceous period of Mongolia. The holotype specimen, the partial skeleton of an adult with its bones encapsulated in calcium carbonate, was discovered in the 1980s as part of the Joint Soviet-Mongolian Paleontological Expedition, and was subsequently transported to the Paleontological Institute of the Russian Academy of Sciences. In 1992, it was described by palaeontologist Sergei Kurzanov. The sole species of Udanoceratops, also the type species, is Udanoceratops tschizhovi, named after a colleague of Kurzanov, D. O. Tschizhov. Additional remains have been assigned to Udanoceratops, though these may be misattributions.

Udanoceratops is the largest known leptoceratopsid, with some estimates placing it at about 4 m (13 ft) in length and 700 kg (1,500 lb) in weight. Its skull, though incomplete, probably was between 60–70 cm (24–28 in) in length, half as long again as that of the second-largest leptoceratopsid, Montanoceratops from North America. Udanoceratops' skull was far deeper and more robust than that of other leptoceratopsids, with larger nasal cavities and presumably a heavier beak. The projections on Udanoceratops' cheek bones would have supported a large patch of keratin. The bone of its snout above the beak was completely smooth, bearing neither the horns nor the slight tubercles of related taxa.

Editorial summary

The public source identifies “Udanoceratops” as genus of reptiles (fossil). This brief keeps that definition visible, then builds a research path around Udanoceratops, genus and reptiles.

Editorial reviewA practical orientation to terminology and classification, particularly when read beside dated observations, specimens or technical literature. The current lead gives the account dated anchors—1992—that can be checked directly. The selected authority fields contribute no independent date. Its value is orientation rather than verdict, with Udanoceratops, genus and reptiles providing the first useful test.
Editorial analysis

Why this record matters

A short description can identify a subject without explaining its stakes. For “Udanoceratops”, the useful work is to connect “genus of reptiles (fossil)” to the records capable of establishing context and consequence.

Evidence profile

The date and method of observation matter as much as the stated conclusion, especially where classification or consensus has changed. The source revision retrieved here is dated Sep 26, 2026. The linked authority identifier is Q132581. None of the 0 selected statements returned an explicit reference. The first chronological checks are 1992.

Critical limits

Current terminology should not be projected backward without checking the classification used when the underlying evidence was created. The source lead contains qualifying language; that uncertainty should survive quotation, summary and reuse. Authority statements aid reconciliation but still require their own references, qualifiers and ranks to be checked.

How to read it

Check terminology, classification and the date of the cited evidence. Scientific names and technical consensus can change while older records retain historical value.

Best used for
  • Current terminology
  • Classification context
  • Finding cited technical literature
Verify next

Primary datasets, specimen catalogues, standards bodies and the most recent peer-reviewed literature.

Three-step research path

  1. Establish the record: confirm the title “Udanoceratops”, its source revision and the description used here.
  2. Expand the search: follow Udanoceratops primary sources, Udanoceratops archive and Udanoceratops research across catalogues and specialist indexes.
  3. Test the account: compare the strongest cited source with the responsible institution’s current record and note any disagreement.

Questions for further research

  1. Which source most directly establishes the central claim about “Udanoceratops”?
  2. Is the terminology current, historical or disputed?
  3. Has classification or technical consensus changed since the cited source?
Subject index

Search terms from this dossier

Source & attribution

This entry incorporates text from “Udanoceratops” on English Wikipedia. Contributors are listed in the page history. Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 License. Selected authority identifiers and statements are retrieved from Wikidata under CC0; their references and qualifiers remain part of the verification path.