CACrown ArchivesThe cinema collection
Menu
Research dossier · General Reference

UK Socca

Open-knowledge reference entry

Cross-disciplinary reference desk with index cards, atlas, dictionary and catalogue
General referenceInterpretive dossier study · Crown Archives visual atlas
Record originEnglish Wikipedia
Text licenseCC BY-SA 4.0
Source revisionJan 29, 2026
Entity authorityQ16258743
Source-derived summary

UK Socca, previously known as United Kingdom Minifootball Association (UKMA), is the license holder for International Socca Federation in the United Kingdom.

The UK Socca is also licensed to supply the national teams for the four home countries (England, Scotland, Wales and Northern Ireland), usually through Leisure Leagues, on continental and world tournaments.

Venue accreditation

The UK Socca also accredits venues throughout the UK to be charter standard for league operators for the role of minifootball, and also assists its member affiliates in promoting minifootball throughout the United Kingdom.

Venues across the UK have applied to be accredited, with the first announced as being the Wakefield Football Centre.

Membership

The UK Minifootball Associations annual report in 2012 listed its key objective as reaching its target of 1,3 million players within its membership by the end of 2015. On 20 February 2013 the UKMA announced it had recruited 5,000 players so far in the year.

At the end of the year in 2013, membership stood at over 100,000.

Sponsorship

The UK Socca has key partners including leading sportswear manufacturer Umbro, which supply the kit for the National teams and the UK's leading manufacturer of astroturf pitches, Tiger Turf UK.

Squad selection

Players were selected in 2013 after a series of nation-wide trials. The idea was to take the grass roots players and give them chance to represent their country. Some of these players became local celebrities, and their achievements were covered by local media.

Editorial summary

Begin with the source’s own compact description: “UK Socca” is open-knowledge reference entry. The dossier treats that line as a proposition to test through Socca, Open-knowledge and entry, not as a finished interpretation.

Editorial reviewA practical starting point whose main value is the path it opens into stronger specialist and primary sources. The current lead gives the account dated anchors—2012, 2015, 2013—that can be checked directly. The linked authority record independently contributes the date 2012. For this dossier, Socca, Open-knowledge and entry is the immediate research focus.
Editorial analysis

Why this record matters

The phrase “open-knowledge reference entry” supplies a clear boundary for inquiry. It also exposes the unanswered questions: who defined that boundary, when it became stable and which sources sit outside it.

Evidence profile

The citation trail is more important than the brevity of the summary: it shows where individual claims can be examined in context. The source revision retrieved here is dated Jan 29, 2026. The linked authority identifier is Q16258743. 1 of 1 selected statements include explicit references; 0 carry qualifiers and 0 use preferred rank. The first chronological checks are 2012, 2015 and 2013.

Critical limits

A concise general-reference account can conceal disagreements about scope, terminology or the weight assigned to individual sources. The lead is largely declarative, so disagreement and counter-evidence require a deliberate search beyond the opening account. Authority statements aid reconciliation but still require their own references, qualifiers and ranks to be checked.

How to read it

Use the entry as an orientation point, then follow its citations and revision history. Names, dates and institutional relationships should be checked against the original record.

Best used for
  • Subject orientation
  • Search vocabulary
  • Locating named sources
Verify next

The closest primary source, responsible institution and strongest cited specialist reference.

Three-step research path

  1. Establish the record: confirm the title “UK Socca”, its source revision and the description used here.
  2. Expand the search: follow UK Socca primary sources, UK Socca archive and Socca research across catalogues and specialist indexes.
  3. Test the account: compare the strongest cited source with the responsible institution’s current record and note any disagreement.

Questions for further research

  1. Which source most directly establishes the central claim about “UK Socca”?
  2. Which institution is responsible for the underlying evidence?
  3. Which cited source is closest to the event, object or claim?
Subject index

Search terms from this dossier

Source & attribution

This entry incorporates text from UK Socca” on English Wikipedia. Contributors are listed in the page history. Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 License. Selected authority identifiers and statements are retrieved from Wikidata under CC0; their references and qualifiers remain part of the verification path.