CACrown ArchivesThe cinema collection
EN/FR
Search
Menu
Research dossier · General Reference

U.D. Tocha

football club

Cross-disciplinary reference desk with index cards, atlas, dictionary and catalogue
General referenceInterpretive dossier study · Crown Archives visual atlas
Record originEnglish Wikipedia
Text licenseCC BY-SA 4.0
Source revisionJul 20, 2024
Entity authorityQ10388003 ↗
Source-derived summary

União Desportiva da Tocha is a Portuguese sports club from Tocha.

The men's football team last finished 2nd in the Honra A AF Coimbra of 2019–20. The team was a mainstay in the Terceira Divisão from 2002 to 2012, when it contested the third-tier 2012–13 Segunda Divisão. From there, the team was relegated to the district league. In the Taça de Portugal, Tocha notably reached the fourth round in 2007–08.

Editorial summary

This brief starts where responsible research should: with the source description of “U.D. Tocha” as football club. Everything that follows is an evidence route, not borrowed authority.

Editorial reviewA concise reference frame for defining the subject, testing terminology and identifying the institution closest to the evidence. The current lead gives the account dated anchors—2019, 2002, 2012, 2007—that can be checked directly. The linked authority record independently contributes the date 1953. The account is most persuasive where Tocha, football and club can be independently traced.
Editorial analysis

Why this record matters

The subject matters to the general reference register because the source frames it as football club. Its deeper value depends on whether names, dates, institutions and citations support that framing.

Evidence profile

Named sources, stable identifiers and responsible institutions provide the strongest route from overview to verifiable evidence. The source revision retrieved here is dated Jul 20, 2024. The linked authority identifier is Q10388003. 2 of 2 selected statements include explicit references; 0 carry qualifiers and 0 use preferred rank. The first chronological checks are 2019, 2002, 2012 and 2007.

Critical limits

A concise general-reference account can conceal disagreements about scope, terminology or the weight assigned to individual sources. The lead is largely declarative, so disagreement and counter-evidence require a deliberate search beyond the opening account. Authority statements aid reconciliation but still require their own references, qualifiers and ranks to be checked.

How to read it

Use the entry as an orientation point, then follow its citations and revision history. Names, dates and institutional relationships should be checked against the original record.

Best used for
  • Subject orientation
  • Search vocabulary
  • Locating named sources
Verify next

The closest primary source, responsible institution and strongest cited specialist reference.

Three-step research path

  1. Establish the record: confirm the title “U.D. Tocha”, its source revision and the description used here.
  2. Expand the search: follow U.D. Tocha primary sources, U.D. Tocha archive and Tocha research across catalogues and specialist indexes.
  3. Test the account: compare the strongest cited source with the responsible institution’s current record and note any disagreement.

Questions for further research

  1. Which source most directly establishes the central claim about “U.D. Tocha”?
  2. What terminology or title could unlock a more precise catalogue search?
  3. Which cited source is closest to the event, object or claim?
Subject index

Search terms from this dossier

Source & attribution

This entry incorporates text from “U.D. Tocha” on English Wikipedia. Contributors are listed in the page history. Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 License. Selected authority identifiers and statements are retrieved from Wikidata under CC0; their references and qualifiers remain part of the verification path.