CACrown ArchivesThe cinema collection
Menu
Research dossier · General Reference

U.S. military response during the September 11 attacks

military reaction to terror attacks on iconic United States landmarks

Cross-disciplinary reference desk with index cards, atlas, dictionary and catalogue
General referenceInterpretive dossier study · Crown Archives visual atlas
Record originEnglish Wikipedia
Text licenseCC BY-SA 4.0
Source revisionSep 19, 2026
Entity authorityQ7863473 ↗
Source-derived summary

On the morning of Tuesday, September 11, 2001, Islamist militant organization al-Qaeda, led by Osama bin Laden, hijacked four commercial airliners in the United States and tried to crash them into large buildings, succeeding in three cases. American Airlines Flight 11, having departed from Logan International Airport in Boston, was flown into the North Tower of the World Trade Center at 08:46. United Airlines Flight 175, also leaving from Boston, struck the South Tower at 09:03. American Airlines Flight 77, from Dulles International Airport, hit the Pentagon at 09:37. United Airlines Flight 93, from Newark International Airport, was crashed near Shanksville, Pennsylvania, at 10:03, after the passengers on board revolted.

Standing orders on September 11 dictated that, on receiving a request for help from the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), the North American Aerospace Defense Command (NORAD) would normally order escort aircraft to approach and follow an aircraft that was confirmed to be hijacked in order to ensure positive flight following, report unusual observations, and help in search and rescue in an emergency. The 9/11 Commission determined that, on the morning of September 11, the FAA had not notified NORAD of the hijackings of Flights 11, 77, 93, and 175 in time for escort aircraft to reach the hijacked flights. Notification of the hijacking of Flight 11 prompted the scrambling of two fighter jets from Otis Air National Guard Base, but they were not in the air until after Flight 11 had hit the North Tower. An erroneous FAA report of a hijacked plane heading towards Washington ("phantom Flight 11") prompted the scrambling of three fighters from the 1st Fighter Wing at Langley Air Force Base, which, because of "poor communications", flew east, out to sea, not toward Washington, significantly delaying their arrival on the scene.

Radar tracking

On taking control of the airliners, the hijackers of the four planes switched off the transponders or changed their codes, making it difficult to track them on radar.

Editorial summary

“U.S. military response during the September 11 attacks” enters the record as military reaction to terror attacks on iconic United States landmarks. Crown Archives preserves that source wording while asking what military, response and during can confirm, complicate or overturn.

Editorial reviewA concise reference frame for defining the subject, testing terminology and identifying the institution closest to the evidence. The current lead gives the account dated anchors—2001—that can be checked directly. The selected authority fields contribute no independent date. Its strongest next move is a source search built around military, response and during.
Editorial analysis

Why this record matters

“U.S. military response during the September 11 attacks” is worth following because a concise public description often conceals a longer documentary argument. Here, military, response and during provides the most credible route into that argument.

Evidence profile

Vocabulary and entity names are the principal evidence signals here, because they determine the precision of every later search. The source revision retrieved here is dated Sep 19, 2026. The linked authority identifier is Q7863473. None of the 0 selected statements returned an explicit reference. The first chronological checks are 2001.

Critical limits

Overview language is designed for orientation and should not be treated as a substitute for the evidence cited beneath it. The lead is largely declarative, so disagreement and counter-evidence require a deliberate search beyond the opening account. Authority statements aid reconciliation but still require their own references, qualifiers and ranks to be checked.

How to read it

Use the entry as an orientation point, then follow its citations and revision history. Names, dates and institutional relationships should be checked against the original record.

Best used for
  • Subject orientation
  • Search vocabulary
  • Locating named sources
Verify next

The closest primary source, responsible institution and strongest cited specialist reference.

Three-step research path

  1. Establish the record: confirm the title “U.S. military response during the September 11 attacks”, its source revision and the description used here.
  2. Expand the search: follow U.S. military response during the September 11 attacks primary sources, U.S. military response during the September 11 attacks archive and military research across catalogues and specialist indexes.
  3. Test the account: compare the strongest cited source with the responsible institution’s current record and note any disagreement.

Questions for further research

  1. Which source most directly establishes the central claim about “U.S. military response during the September 11 attacks”?
  2. Which cited source is closest to the event, object or claim?
  3. Which institution is responsible for the underlying evidence?
Subject index

Search terms from this dossier

Source & attribution

This entry incorporates text from “U.S. military response during the September 11 attacks” on English Wikipedia. Contributors are listed in the page history. Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 License. Selected authority identifiers and statements are retrieved from Wikidata under CC0; their references and qualifiers remain part of the verification path.