CACrown ArchivesThe cinema collection
EN/FR
Search
Menu
Research dossier · General Reference

U.D. Gândara

football club

Cross-disciplinary reference desk with index cards, atlas, dictionary and catalogue
General referenceInterpretive dossier study · Crown Archives visual atlas
Record originEnglish Wikipedia
Text licenseCC BY-SA 4.0
Source revisionDec 23, 2024
Entity authorityQ10388000 ↗
Source-derived summary

União Desportiva da Gândara is a Portuguese sports club from Moinhos da Gândara, Figueira da Foz.

The men's football team played in the I league of AF Coimbra, but after winning that league in 2012–13, no team was fielded again. The team previously played on the Terceira Divisão, the Portuguese fourth tier, as late as 2006 to 2011. They also contested the Taça de Portugal during these years.

Editorial summary

Begin with the source’s own compact description: “U.D. Gândara” is football club. The dossier treats that line as a proposition to test through Gândara, football and club, not as a finished interpretation.

Editorial reviewA dependable orientation record for establishing vocabulary, names and a first evidence trail. The current lead gives the account dated anchors—2012, 2006, 2011—that can be checked directly. The selected authority fields contribute no independent date. For this dossier, Gândara, football and club is the immediate research focus.
Editorial analysis

Why this record matters

The phrase “football club” supplies a clear boundary for inquiry. It also exposes the unanswered questions: who defined that boundary, when it became stable and which sources sit outside it.

Evidence profile

Vocabulary and entity names are the principal evidence signals here, because they determine the precision of every later search. The source revision retrieved here is dated Dec 23, 2024. The linked authority identifier is Q10388000. None of the 0 selected statements returned an explicit reference. The first chronological checks are 2012, 2006 and 2011.

Critical limits

A concise general-reference account can conceal disagreements about scope, terminology or the weight assigned to individual sources. The lead is largely declarative, so disagreement and counter-evidence require a deliberate search beyond the opening account. Authority statements aid reconciliation but still require their own references, qualifiers and ranks to be checked.

How to read it

Use the entry as an orientation point, then follow its citations and revision history. Names, dates and institutional relationships should be checked against the original record.

Best used for
  • Subject orientation
  • Search vocabulary
  • Locating named sources
Verify next

The closest primary source, responsible institution and strongest cited specialist reference.

Three-step research path

  1. Establish the record: confirm the title “U.D. Gândara”, its source revision and the description used here.
  2. Expand the search: follow U.D. Gândara primary sources, U.D. Gândara archive and Gândara research across catalogues and specialist indexes.
  3. Test the account: compare the strongest cited source with the responsible institution’s current record and note any disagreement.

Questions for further research

  1. Which source most directly establishes the central claim about “U.D. Gândara”?
  2. Which institution is responsible for the underlying evidence?
  3. Which cited source is closest to the event, object or claim?
Subject index

Search terms from this dossier

Source & attribution

This entry incorporates text from “U.D. Gândara” on English Wikipedia. Contributors are listed in the page history. Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 License. Selected authority identifiers and statements are retrieved from Wikidata under CC0; their references and qualifiers remain part of the verification path.