U-COM Burundi
Open-knowledge reference entry
U-COM Burundi, operating as LEO was a wireless telephone company in Burundi, a subsidiary of VimpelCom.
It was purchased by Econet Wireless in 2014 and merged with Econet Wireless Burundi to form Econet Leo.
History
U-Com Burundi was owned by Orascom Telecom Holding, a subsidiary of Vimpelcom group.
It was founded in 1985 and started an AMPS 800 mobile network in Burundi in September 1993.
LEO started to provide voice services in 1993 and data services in 2007.
U-Com Burundi was awarded a GSM license in 1999, and launched GSM services in February 2000.
After Burundi became a member of the East African Community in 2007, the landline incumbent Onatel Burundi formed a consortium with other Burundian telecommunications companies including Africell, U-COM Burundi, CBINET and Econet Wireless to build the Burundi Backbone System (BBS) fiber optic network.
As of Q3 2011 LEO had over 56% of the Burundi mobile market, with 1,132,000 subscribers.
It had 245 telecom sites, including off-grid and on-grid sites.
Since power was unreliable, both types of site had diesel generators.
The public source identifies “U-COM Burundi” as open-knowledge reference entry. This brief keeps that definition visible, then builds a research path around U-COM, Burundi and Open-knowledge.
Why this record matters
A short description can identify a subject without explaining its stakes. For “U-COM Burundi”, the useful work is to connect “open-knowledge reference entry” to the records capable of establishing context and consequence.
Named sources, stable identifiers and responsible institutions provide the strongest route from overview to verifiable evidence. The source revision retrieved here is dated Sep 21, 2024. The linked authority identifier is Q130425985. None of the 0 selected statements returned an explicit reference. The first chronological checks are 2014, 1985, 1993 and 2007.
A concise general-reference account can conceal disagreements about scope, terminology or the weight assigned to individual sources. The lead is largely declarative, so disagreement and counter-evidence require a deliberate search beyond the opening account. Authority statements aid reconciliation but still require their own references, qualifiers and ranks to be checked.
How to read it
Use the entry as an orientation point, then follow its citations and revision history. Names, dates and institutional relationships should be checked against the original record.
- Subject orientation
- Search vocabulary
- Locating named sources
The closest primary source, responsible institution and strongest cited specialist reference.
Three-step research path
- Establish the record: confirm the title “U-COM Burundi”, its source revision and the description used here.
- Expand the search: follow U-COM Burundi primary sources, U-COM Burundi archive and U-COM research across catalogues and specialist indexes.
- Test the account: compare the strongest cited source with the responsible institution’s current record and note any disagreement.
Questions for further research
- Which source most directly establishes the central claim about “U-COM Burundi”?
- Which institution is responsible for the underlying evidence?
- What terminology or title could unlock a more precise catalogue search?
Search terms from this dossier
This entry incorporates text from “U-COM Burundi” on English Wikipedia. Contributors are listed in the page history. Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 License. Selected authority identifiers and statements are retrieved from Wikidata under CC0; their references and qualifiers remain part of the verification path.