CACrown ArchivesThe cinema collection
Menu
Research dossier · Science & Nature

Tympanocryptis mccartneyi

species of lizard

Specimen drawers, botanical folios and brass scientific instruments under study light
Science and natureInterpretive dossier study · Crown Archives visual atlas
Record originEnglish Wikipedia
Text licenseCC BY-SA 4.0
Source revisionAug 21, 2026
Entity authorityQ106606354 ↗
Source-derived summary

Tympanocryptis mccartneyi, the Bathurst grassland earless dragon, is a species of agama, endemic to New South Wales, Australia.

Discovery and description

Tympanocryptis mccartneyi was described in the same paper as T. osbornei, published in 2019 in the open-access journal Royal Society Open Science, after genetic testing and CT scans of Tympanocryptis specimens showed that they were not T. pinguicolla as previously thought. The paper's first author was Jane Melville. The authors described a new species from the area of Bathurst, New South Wales, with a more precise location concealed due to conservation concerns; the species was named in honour of Ian McCartney, a former Bathurst-area park ranger and naturalist who aided in the species' discovery.

Distribution

Tympanocryptis mccartneyi is an isolated species believed to be found only in the area around Bathurst, and its range does not overlap with any other Tympanocryptis lizards. T. mccartneyi is a specialist inhabitant of grasslands, plains, and paddocks in alluvial plains.

Conservation

All Tympanocryptis species are protected by CITES. Tympanocryptis mccartneyi is recognized as critically endangered by both New South Wales and the national Environment Protection and Biodiversity Conservation Act 1999.

Editorial summary

“Tympanocryptis mccartneyi” enters the record as species of lizard. Crown Archives preserves that source wording while asking what Tympanocryptis, mccartneyi and species can confirm, complicate or overturn.

Editorial reviewA practical orientation to terminology and classification, particularly when read beside dated observations, specimens or technical literature. The current lead gives the account dated anchors—2019, 1999—that can be checked directly. The selected authority fields contribute no independent date. Its strongest next move is a source search built around Tympanocryptis, mccartneyi and species.
Editorial analysis

Why this record matters

“Tympanocryptis mccartneyi” is worth following because a concise public description often conceals a longer documentary argument. Here, Tympanocryptis, mccartneyi and species provides the most credible route into that argument.

Evidence profile

Stable identifiers, scientific names and standards terminology offer the best bridge between this overview and specialist evidence. The source revision retrieved here is dated Aug 21, 2026. The linked authority identifier is Q106606354. None of the 0 selected statements returned an explicit reference. The first chronological checks are 2019 and 1999.

Critical limits

Scientific names, classifications and consensus can change while older terminology persists in catalogues and historical literature. The lead is largely declarative, so disagreement and counter-evidence require a deliberate search beyond the opening account. Authority statements aid reconciliation but still require their own references, qualifiers and ranks to be checked.

How to read it

Check terminology, classification and the date of the cited evidence. Scientific names and technical consensus can change while older records retain historical value.

Best used for
  • Current terminology
  • Classification context
  • Finding cited technical literature
Verify next

Primary datasets, specimen catalogues, standards bodies and the most recent peer-reviewed literature.

Three-step research path

  1. Establish the record: confirm the title “Tympanocryptis mccartneyi”, its source revision and the description used here.
  2. Expand the search: follow Tympanocryptis mccartneyi primary sources, Tympanocryptis mccartneyi archive and Tympanocryptis research across catalogues and specialist indexes.
  3. Test the account: compare the strongest cited source with the responsible institution’s current record and note any disagreement.

Questions for further research

  1. Which source most directly establishes the central claim about “Tympanocryptis mccartneyi”?
  2. Has classification or technical consensus changed since the cited source?
  3. Which observation, specimen, dataset or publication supports the account?
Subject index

Search terms from this dossier

Source & attribution

This entry incorporates text from “Tympanocryptis mccartneyi” on English Wikipedia. Contributors are listed in the page history. Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 License. Selected authority identifiers and statements are retrieved from Wikidata under CC0; their references and qualifiers remain part of the verification path.