CACrown ArchivesThe cinema collection
Menu
Research dossier · General Reference

Bernoulli distribution

discrete probability distribution which compels the random variable to take one of two values

Cross-disciplinary reference desk with index cards, atlas, dictionary and catalogue
General referenceInterpretive dossier study · Crown Archives visual atlas
Record originEnglish Wikipedia
Text licenseCC BY-SA 4.0
Source revisionFeb 16, 2026
Entity authorityQ391371
Source-derived summary

In probability theory and statistics, the Bernoulli distribution, named after Swiss mathematician Jacob Bernoulli, is the discrete probability distribution of a random variable which takes the value 1 with probability

p

{\displaystyle p}

and the value 0 with probability

q

=

1

p

{\displaystyle q=1-p}

. Less formally, it can be thought of as a model for the set of possible outcomes of any single experiment that asks a yes–no question. Such questions lead to outcomes that are Boolean-valued: a single bit whose value is success/yes/true/one with probability p and failure/no/false/zero with probability q. It can be used to represent a (possibly biased) coin toss where 1 and 0 would represent "heads" and "tails", respectively, and p would be the probability of the coin landing on heads (or vice versa where 1 would represent tails and p would be the probability of tails). In particular, unfair coins would have

p

1

/

2.

{\displaystyle p\neq 1/2.}

The Bernoulli distribution is a special case of the binomial distribution where a single trial is conducted (so n would be 1 for such a binomial distribution). It is also a special case of the two-point distribution, for which the possible outcomes need not be 0 and 1.

Properties

If

X

{\displaystyle X}

is a random variable with a Bernoulli distribution, then:

Pr

(

X

=

1

)

=

p

,

Pr

(

X

=

0

)

=

q

=

1

p

.

{\displaystyle {\begin{aligned}\Pr(X{=}1)&=p,\\\Pr(X{=}0)&=q=1-p.\end{aligned}}}

The probability mass function

f

{\displaystyle f}

of this distribution, over possible outcomes k, is

f

(

k

;

p

)

=

{

p

if

k

=

1

,

q

=

1

p

if

k

=

0.

{\displaystyle f(k;p)={\begin{cases}p&{\text{if }}k=1,\\q=1-p&{\text{if }}k=0.\end{cases}}}

This can also be expressed as

f

(

k

;

p

)

=

p

k

(

1

p

)

1

k

for

k

{

0

,

1

}

{\displaystyle f(k;p)=p^{k}(1-p)^{1-k}\quad {\text{for }}k\in \{0,1\}}

or as

f

(

k

;

p

)

=

p

k

+

(

1

p

)

(

1

k

)

for

k

{

0

,

1

}

.

Editorial summary

This brief starts where responsible research should: with the source description of “Bernoulli distribution” as discrete probability distribution which compels the random variable to take one of two values. Everything that follows is an evidence route, not borrowed authority.

Editorial reviewA dependable orientation record for establishing vocabulary, names and a first evidence trail. The current 353-word lead offers orientation but no explicit four-digit date, so chronology should not be assumed. The selected authority fields contribute no independent date. The account is most persuasive where Bernoulli, distribution and discrete can be independently traced.
Editorial analysis

Why this record matters

The subject matters to the general reference register because the source frames it as discrete probability distribution which compels the random variable to take one of two values. Its deeper value depends on whether names, dates, institutions and citations support that framing.

Evidence profile

The citation trail is more important than the brevity of the summary: it shows where individual claims can be examined in context. The source revision retrieved here is dated Feb 16, 2026. The linked authority identifier is Q391371. None of the 0 selected statements returned an explicit reference.

Critical limits

Overview language is designed for orientation and should not be treated as a substitute for the evidence cited beneath it. The lead is largely declarative, so disagreement and counter-evidence require a deliberate search beyond the opening account. Authority statements aid reconciliation but still require their own references, qualifiers and ranks to be checked.

How to read it

Use the entry as an orientation point, then follow its citations and revision history. Names, dates and institutional relationships should be checked against the original record.

Best used for
  • Subject orientation
  • Search vocabulary
  • Locating named sources
Verify next

The closest primary source, responsible institution and strongest cited specialist reference.

Three-step research path

  1. Establish the record: confirm the title “Bernoulli distribution”, its source revision and the description used here.
  2. Expand the search: follow Bernoulli distribution primary sources, Bernoulli distribution archive and Bernoulli research across catalogues and specialist indexes.
  3. Test the account: compare the strongest cited source with the responsible institution’s current record and note any disagreement.

Questions for further research

  1. Which source most directly establishes the central claim about “Bernoulli distribution”?
  2. What terminology or title could unlock a more precise catalogue search?
  3. Which cited source is closest to the event, object or claim?
Subject index

Search terms from this dossier

Source & attribution

This entry incorporates text from Bernoulli distribution” on English Wikipedia. Contributors are listed in the page history. Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 License. Selected authority identifiers and statements are retrieved from Wikidata under CC0; their references and qualifiers remain part of the verification path.