CACrown ArchivesThe cinema collection
EN/FR
Search
Menu
Research dossier · General Reference

Tweesluizen

hamlet in Buren, Netherlands

Cross-disciplinary reference desk with index cards, atlas, dictionary and catalogue
General referenceInterpretive dossier study · Crown Archives visual atlas
Record originEnglish Wikipedia
Text licenseCC BY-SA 4.0
Source revisionApr 21, 2026
Entity authorityQ2710579 ↗
Source-derived summary

Tweesluizen is a hamlet in the Dutch province of Gelderland. It is a part of the municipality of Buren, and lies about 4 km west of Tiel.

Tweesluizen is not a statistical entity, and the postal authorities have placed it under Kapel-Avezaath. It was first mentioned in 1899 as Twee Sluizen, and means two sluices. It consists of about 20 houses.

Editorial summary

This brief starts where responsible research should: with the source description of “Tweesluizen” as hamlet in Buren, Netherlands. Everything that follows is an evidence route, not borrowed authority.

Editorial reviewA concise reference frame for defining the subject, testing terminology and identifying the institution closest to the evidence. The current lead gives the account dated anchors—1899—that can be checked directly. The selected authority fields contribute no independent date. The account is most persuasive where Tweesluizen, hamlet and Buren can be independently traced.
Editorial analysis

Why this record matters

The subject matters to the general reference register because the source frames it as hamlet in Buren, Netherlands. Its deeper value depends on whether names, dates, institutions and citations support that framing.

Evidence profile

Named sources, stable identifiers and responsible institutions provide the strongest route from overview to verifiable evidence. The source revision retrieved here is dated Apr 21, 2026. The linked authority identifier is Q2710579. Authority coordinates are 51.888, 5.361. 1 of 1 selected statements include explicit references; 0 carry qualifiers and 0 use preferred rank. The first chronological checks are 1899.

Critical limits

The absence of detail may reflect summary conventions rather than a lack of surviving documentation. The lead is largely declarative, so disagreement and counter-evidence require a deliberate search beyond the opening account. Authority statements aid reconciliation but still require their own references, qualifiers and ranks to be checked.

How to read it

Use the entry as an orientation point, then follow its citations and revision history. Names, dates and institutional relationships should be checked against the original record.

Best used for
  • Subject orientation
  • Search vocabulary
  • Locating named sources
Verify next

The closest primary source, responsible institution and strongest cited specialist reference.

Three-step research path

  1. Establish the record: confirm the title “Tweesluizen”, its source revision and the description used here.
  2. Expand the search: follow Tweesluizen primary sources, Tweesluizen archive and Tweesluizen research across catalogues and specialist indexes.
  3. Test the account: compare the strongest cited source with the responsible institution’s current record and note any disagreement.

Questions for further research

  1. Which source most directly establishes the central claim about “Tweesluizen”?
  2. Which cited source is closest to the event, object or claim?
  3. What terminology or title could unlock a more precise catalogue search?
Subject index

Search terms from this dossier

Source & attribution

This entry incorporates text from “Tweesluizen” on English Wikipedia. Contributors are listed in the page history. Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 License. Selected authority identifiers and statements are retrieved from Wikidata under CC0; their references and qualifiers remain part of the verification path.