Tverberg's theorem
theorem in discrete geometry

In discrete geometry, Tverberg's theorem, first stated by Helge Tverberg in 1966, is the result that sufficiently many points in Euclidean space can be partitioned into subsets with intersecting convex hulls. Specifically, for any positive integers
d
,
r
{\displaystyle d,r}
and any set of
(
d
+
1
)
(
r
−
1
)
+
1
{\displaystyle (d+1)(r-1)+1\ }
points in
d
{\displaystyle d}
-dimensional Euclidean space there exists a partition of the given points into
r
{\displaystyle r}
subsets whose convex hulls all have a common point; in other words, there exists a point
x
{\displaystyle x}
(not necessarily one of the given points) such that
x
{\displaystyle x}
belongs to the convex hull of all of the subsets.
The partition resulting from this theorem is known as a Tverberg partition.
The special case
r
=
2
{\displaystyle r=2}
was proved earlier by Radon, and it is known as Radon's theorem.
Examples
The case
d
=
1
{\displaystyle d=1}
states that any
2
r
−
1
{\displaystyle 2r-1}
points on the real line can be partitioned into
r
{\displaystyle r}
subsets with intersecting convex hulls. Indeed, if the points are
x
1
<
x
2
<
.
.
.
<
x
2
r
−
1
{\displaystyle x_{1}<x_{2}<...<x_{2r-1}}
, then the partition into
A
i
=
{
x
i
,
x
2
r
−
i
}
{\displaystyle A_{i}=\{x_{i},x_{2r-i}\}}
for
i
=
1
,
.
.
Begin with the source’s own compact description: “Tverberg's theorem” is theorem in discrete geometry. The dossier treats that line as a proposition to test through Tverberg's, theorem and discrete, not as a finished interpretation.
Why this record matters
The phrase “theorem in discrete geometry” supplies a clear boundary for inquiry. It also exposes the unanswered questions: who defined that boundary, when it became stable and which sources sit outside it.
Named sources, stable identifiers and responsible institutions provide the strongest route from overview to verifiable evidence. The source revision retrieved here is dated Jul 7, 2026. The linked authority identifier is Q7857350. None of the 0 selected statements returned an explicit reference. The first chronological checks are 1966.
A concise general-reference account can conceal disagreements about scope, terminology or the weight assigned to individual sources. The lead is largely declarative, so disagreement and counter-evidence require a deliberate search beyond the opening account. Authority statements aid reconciliation but still require their own references, qualifiers and ranks to be checked.
How to read it
Use the entry as an orientation point, then follow its citations and revision history. Names, dates and institutional relationships should be checked against the original record.
- Subject orientation
- Search vocabulary
- Locating named sources
The closest primary source, responsible institution and strongest cited specialist reference.
Three-step research path
- Establish the record: confirm the title “Tverberg's theorem”, its source revision and the description used here.
- Expand the search: follow Tverberg's theorem primary sources, Tverberg's theorem archive and Tverberg's research across catalogues and specialist indexes.
- Test the account: compare the strongest cited source with the responsible institution’s current record and note any disagreement.
Questions for further research
- Which source most directly establishes the central claim about “Tverberg's theorem”?
- Which cited source is closest to the event, object or claim?
- What terminology or title could unlock a more precise catalogue search?
Search terms from this dossier
This entry incorporates text from “Tverberg's theorem” on English Wikipedia. Contributors are listed in the page history. Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 License. Selected authority identifiers and statements are retrieved from Wikidata under CC0; their references and qualifiers remain part of the verification path.