Disease of Turku
the name given to the demolition of old houses of Turku in 1960-1970s and corruption related to it

The disease of Turku (Finnish: Turun tauti; Swedish: Åbosmittan) was the demolition of old buildings of cultural and historical significance in Turku, Finland, in the 1960s and 1970s to make way for new buildings, and the corruption associated with it. Although the name mentions Turku, similar urban development took place in several other Finnish cities. The term only began to be used after the worst wave of demolitions in the 1980s, when Turku's municipal policy was criticized in the Finnish press.
Background
Turku faced a severe housing shortage following the Second World War. According to population projections, the city's population would have risen to over 200,000 in a few decades. To cope with the increase, land use had to be made more efficient and the old wooden building stock had to be demolished to make way for new apartment buildings and commercial buildings. It was more profitable for developers to demolish old buildings rather than repair them, and the new apartments sold very well. The first valuable buildings to be demolished in the center of Turku were the Lindblom House and Hotel Phoenix.
The reconstruction or renovation of the grid plan area of Turku was most extensive from the late 1950s to the early 1960s. New buildings were built without any regulation from a cityscape perspective, and the town planning was done one plot or block at a time using "postage stamp plans" for the needs of each building site.
Begin with the source’s own compact description: “Disease of Turku” is the name given to the demolition of old houses of Turku in 1960-1970s and corruption related to it. The dossier treats that line as a proposition to test through Disease, Turku and name, not as a finished interpretation.
Why this record matters
The phrase “the name given to the demolition of old houses of Turku in 1960-1970s and corruption related to it” supplies a clear boundary for inquiry. It also exposes the unanswered questions: who defined that boundary, when it became stable and which sources sit outside it.
Named sources, stable identifiers and responsible institutions provide the strongest route from overview to verifiable evidence. The source revision retrieved here is dated May 27, 2026. The linked authority identifier is Q11898809. None of the 0 selected statements returned an explicit reference.
A concise general-reference account can conceal disagreements about scope, terminology or the weight assigned to individual sources. The source lead contains qualifying language; that uncertainty should survive quotation, summary and reuse. Authority statements aid reconciliation but still require their own references, qualifiers and ranks to be checked.
How to read it
Use the entry as an orientation point, then follow its citations and revision history. Names, dates and institutional relationships should be checked against the original record.
- Subject orientation
- Search vocabulary
- Locating named sources
The closest primary source, responsible institution and strongest cited specialist reference.
Three-step research path
- Establish the record: confirm the title “Disease of Turku”, its source revision and the description used here.
- Expand the search: follow Disease of Turku primary sources, Disease of Turku archive and Disease research across catalogues and specialist indexes.
- Test the account: compare the strongest cited source with the responsible institution’s current record and note any disagreement.
Questions for further research
- Which source most directly establishes the central claim about “Disease of Turku”?
- What terminology or title could unlock a more precise catalogue search?
- Which cited source is closest to the event, object or claim?
Search terms from this dossier
This entry incorporates text from “Disease of Turku” on English Wikipedia. Contributors are listed in the page history. Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 License. Selected authority identifiers and statements are retrieved from Wikidata under CC0; their references and qualifiers remain part of the verification path.