CACrown ArchivesThe cinema collection
Menu
Research dossier · General Reference

Tun Tun Aung

Burmese bodybuilder

Cross-disciplinary reference desk with index cards, atlas, dictionary and catalogue
General referenceInterpretive dossier study · Crown Archives visual atlas
Record originEnglish Wikipedia
Text licenseCC BY-SA 4.0
Source revisionJan 25, 2026
Entity authorityQ88743418 ↗
Source-derived summary

Tun Tun Aung (Burmese: ထွန်းထွန်းအောင်) is one of Myanmar's top professional bodybuilders and a personal trainer and winner of Mr Asia 2016.

At 2017, he won gold medals in Asian Bodybuilding and Fitness Championships from Bhutan. He received 2017 Myanmar Best Athlete Award.

Career

He competed at World Bodybuilding and Physique Sports Championship in 2010. He was placed in the top 5.

In 2017, he was awarded gold medal in Asian Bodybuilding and Fitness Championships from Bhutan. And the next year, he was also awarded silver medal at 10th`World Bodybuilding And Physique Sports Championship in Chiang Mai, Thailand.

At 2019, he grabbed the silver medal with Nhin Nhin Aye at the Mixed Pairs Open event from Thailand.

Editorial summary

Begin with the source’s own compact description: “Tun Tun Aung” is burmese bodybuilder. The dossier treats that line as a proposition to test through Aung, Burmese and bodybuilder, not as a finished interpretation.

Editorial reviewA dependable orientation record for establishing vocabulary, names and a first evidence trail. The current lead gives the account dated anchors—2016, 2017, 2010, 2019—that can be checked directly. The linked authority record independently contributes the date 1972. For this dossier, Aung, Burmese and bodybuilder is the immediate research focus.
Editorial analysis

Why this record matters

The phrase “burmese bodybuilder” supplies a clear boundary for inquiry. It also exposes the unanswered questions: who defined that boundary, when it became stable and which sources sit outside it.

Evidence profile

The citation trail is more important than the brevity of the summary: it shows where individual claims can be examined in context. The source revision retrieved here is dated Jan 25, 2026. The linked authority identifier is Q88743418. 1 of 1 selected statements include explicit references; 0 carry qualifiers and 0 use preferred rank. The first chronological checks are 2016, 2017, 2010 and 2019.

Critical limits

The absence of detail may reflect summary conventions rather than a lack of surviving documentation. The lead is largely declarative, so disagreement and counter-evidence require a deliberate search beyond the opening account. Authority statements aid reconciliation but still require their own references, qualifiers and ranks to be checked.

How to read it

Use the entry as an orientation point, then follow its citations and revision history. Names, dates and institutional relationships should be checked against the original record.

Best used for
  • Subject orientation
  • Search vocabulary
  • Locating named sources
Verify next

The closest primary source, responsible institution and strongest cited specialist reference.

Three-step research path

  1. Establish the record: confirm the title “Tun Tun Aung”, its source revision and the description used here.
  2. Expand the search: follow Tun Tun Aung primary sources, Tun Tun Aung archive and Aung research across catalogues and specialist indexes.
  3. Test the account: compare the strongest cited source with the responsible institution’s current record and note any disagreement.

Questions for further research

  1. Which source most directly establishes the central claim about “Tun Tun Aung”?
  2. Which cited source is closest to the event, object or claim?
  3. What terminology or title could unlock a more precise catalogue search?
Subject index

Search terms from this dossier

Source & attribution

This entry incorporates text from “Tun Tun Aung” on English Wikipedia. Contributors are listed in the page history. Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 License. Selected authority identifiers and statements are retrieved from Wikidata under CC0; their references and qualifiers remain part of the verification path.