PewDiePie's Tuber Simulator
2016 freemium simulation mobile game
PewDiePie's Tuber Simulator is a freemium simulation mobile game developed by Outerminds Inc. and featuring PewDiePie, who voices himself. The game's premise focuses on the player creating online videos for views and subscribers, the former of which they can use to purchase goods that can increase performance.
The game was released on 29 September 2016 on iOS and Android. It became the Apple App Store's top download on its release day and on the following day Kjellberg reported that the app had been downloaded over ten million times. The game experienced server issues during its initial launch.
In 2019, Kjellberg frequently advertised the game at the end of some of his videos as the most relevant game, which led to it becoming a popular meme in his fanbase.
Gameplay
The gameplay of Tuber Simulator simulates the life of a YouTuber, with modes similar to PewDiePie himself. The player creates videos which generate "views", a currency used to purchase items from the store as to decorate the player's room. The creation of videos also allows the player to gain YouTube subscribers, essential for the unlocking of select features and achievements.
“PewDiePie's Tuber Simulator” enters the record as 2016 freemium simulation mobile game. Crown Archives preserves that source wording while asking what PewDiePie's, Tuber and Simulator can confirm, complicate or overturn.
Why this record matters
“PewDiePie's Tuber Simulator” is worth following because a concise public description often conceals a longer documentary argument. Here, PewDiePie's, Tuber and Simulator provides the most credible route into that argument.
Named sources, stable identifiers and responsible institutions provide the strongest route from overview to verifiable evidence. The source revision retrieved here is dated Aug 21, 2026. The linked authority identifier is Q27536723. None of the 0 selected statements returned an explicit reference. The first chronological checks are 2016 and 2019.
A concise general-reference account can conceal disagreements about scope, terminology or the weight assigned to individual sources. The lead is largely declarative, so disagreement and counter-evidence require a deliberate search beyond the opening account. Authority statements aid reconciliation but still require their own references, qualifiers and ranks to be checked.
How to read it
Use the entry as an orientation point, then follow its citations and revision history. Names, dates and institutional relationships should be checked against the original record.
- Subject orientation
- Search vocabulary
- Locating named sources
The closest primary source, responsible institution and strongest cited specialist reference.
Three-step research path
- Establish the record: confirm the title “PewDiePie's Tuber Simulator”, its source revision and the description used here.
- Expand the search: follow PewDiePie's Tuber Simulator primary sources, PewDiePie's Tuber Simulator archive and PewDiePie's research across catalogues and specialist indexes.
- Test the account: compare the strongest cited source with the responsible institution’s current record and note any disagreement.
Questions for further research
- Which source most directly establishes the central claim about “PewDiePie's Tuber Simulator”?
- Which institution is responsible for the underlying evidence?
- What terminology or title could unlock a more precise catalogue search?
Search terms from this dossier
This entry incorporates text from “PewDiePie's Tuber Simulator” on English Wikipedia. Contributors are listed in the page history. Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 License. Selected authority identifiers and statements are retrieved from Wikidata under CC0; their references and qualifiers remain part of the verification path.