CACrown ArchivesThe cinema collection
Menu
Research dossier · Science & Nature

Austrovenus stutchburyi

species of mollusc

Specimen drawers, botanical folios and brass scientific instruments under study light
Science and natureInterpretive dossier study · Crown Archives visual atlas
Record originEnglish Wikipedia
Text licenseCC BY-SA 4.0
Source revisionSep 10, 2026
Entity authorityQ3014371
Source-derived summary

Austrovenus stutchburyi, commonly known as the New Zealand cockle or New Zealand little neck clam, is a marine bivalve in the family Veneridae that occurs only in New Zealand. Its Māori name is tuangi in the North Island or tuaki in the South Island. The shell is between 15 to 65 mm (0.59 to 2.56 in) in length, but may reach up to 90 mm (3.5 in). The outside is dirty white; the inside is porcelain white and often has purple stains. A. stutchburyi is widespread throughout the coasts of New Zealand, including the Chatham Islands and subantarctic Auckland Islands. It is found in the intertidal-to-low-tide zone in muddy and fine sands. A. stutchburyi feeds via suspension feeding, where food particles are filtered out of the water. The species is often harvested for food, active commercial harvesting occurring in the Dunedin and Tasman regions. It is a traditional food source for Māori people, who have an archaeological history of harvesting A. stutchburyi and have customary fishing rights to harvest it in areas of cultural significance.

Spawning occurs in spring and summer; the larvae (juvenile stage) attach to a surface within twenty days.

Editorial summary

This brief starts where responsible research should: with the source description of “Austrovenus stutchburyi” as species of mollusc. Everything that follows is an evidence route, not borrowed authority.

Editorial reviewUseful for establishing the present vocabulary of the subject while preserving a route back to the evidence on which that vocabulary rests. The current 192-word lead offers orientation but no explicit four-digit date, so chronology should not be assumed. The selected authority fields contribute no independent date. The account is most persuasive where Austrovenus, stutchburyi and species can be independently traced.
Editorial analysis

Why this record matters

The subject matters to the science & nature register because the source frames it as species of mollusc. Its deeper value depends on whether names, dates, institutions and citations support that framing.

Evidence profile

The date and method of observation matter as much as the stated conclusion, especially where classification or consensus has changed. The source revision retrieved here is dated Sep 10, 2026. The linked authority identifier is Q3014371. None of the 0 selected statements returned an explicit reference.

Critical limits

Current terminology should not be projected backward without checking the classification used when the underlying evidence was created. The source lead contains qualifying language; that uncertainty should survive quotation, summary and reuse. Authority statements aid reconciliation but still require their own references, qualifiers and ranks to be checked.

How to read it

Check terminology, classification and the date of the cited evidence. Scientific names and technical consensus can change while older records retain historical value.

Best used for
  • Current terminology
  • Classification context
  • Finding cited technical literature
Verify next

Primary datasets, specimen catalogues, standards bodies and the most recent peer-reviewed literature.

Three-step research path

  1. Establish the record: confirm the title “Austrovenus stutchburyi”, its source revision and the description used here.
  2. Expand the search: follow Austrovenus stutchburyi primary sources, Austrovenus stutchburyi archive and Austrovenus research across catalogues and specialist indexes.
  3. Test the account: compare the strongest cited source with the responsible institution’s current record and note any disagreement.

Questions for further research

  1. Which source most directly establishes the central claim about “Austrovenus stutchburyi”?
  2. Has classification or technical consensus changed since the cited source?
  3. Is the terminology current, historical or disputed?
Subject index

Search terms from this dossier

Source & attribution

This entry incorporates text from Austrovenus stutchburyi” on English Wikipedia. Contributors are listed in the page history. Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 License. Selected authority identifiers and statements are retrieved from Wikidata under CC0; their references and qualifiers remain part of the verification path.