CACrown ArchivesThe cinema collection
Menu
Research dossier · General Reference

Tsentrolit

foundry in the Republic of Belarus

Cross-disciplinary reference desk with index cards, atlas, dictionary and catalogue
General referenceInterpretive dossier study · Crown Archives visual atlas
Record originEnglish Wikipedia
Text licenseCC BY-SA 4.0
Source revisionJul 18, 2026
Entity authorityQ21394911
Source-derived summary

Tsentrolit (Belarusian: Гомельскі ліцейны завод «Цэнтраліт») is one of the largest foundries in the Republic of Belarus.

It was decided by the Order of the Central Committee of the Communist Party of Belarus and the Council of Ministers of BSSR to build a specialized plant under the project, developed by the Kiev institute "Hyprokhimmash", for production of iron casting for machine tools and mechanical engineering. The construction started in 1963, and in 1965 the first products were manufactured in the premises of the commissioned mechanical repair shop – non-standard equipment for the further development of the own production. The first melting was carried out on 24 October 1968. At that time, Tsentrolit belonged to the system of Minstankoprom (Ministry of machine tools industry) of the USSR, which included nine more Tsentrolit plants in various corners of the Soviet Union.

At present, many of the Tsentrolit plants either have ceased to exist or have been operating as foundry shops or small works due to difficult financial situation. Gomel Tsentrolit has managed to save its production infrastructure.

Current situation

Since 23 December 2010, Gomel Tsentrolit is officially registered as the Public joint stock company Gomel Foundry Plant Tsentrolit (OAO GLZ Tsentrolit). In 2012, OAO GLZ Tsentrolit joined Belstankoinstrumentholding together with 15 other large Belarusian industrial enterprises.

Editorial summary

The public source identifies “Tsentrolit” as foundry in the Republic of Belarus. This brief keeps that definition visible, then builds a research path around Tsentrolit, foundry and Republic.

Editorial reviewA concise reference frame for defining the subject, testing terminology and identifying the institution closest to the evidence. The current lead gives the account dated anchors—1963, 1965, 1968, 2010—that can be checked directly. The linked authority record independently contributes the date 1963. Its value is orientation rather than verdict, with Tsentrolit, foundry and Republic providing the first useful test.
Editorial analysis

Why this record matters

A short description can identify a subject without explaining its stakes. For “Tsentrolit”, the useful work is to connect “foundry in the Republic of Belarus” to the records capable of establishing context and consequence.

Evidence profile

The citation trail is more important than the brevity of the summary: it shows where individual claims can be examined in context. The source revision retrieved here is dated Jul 18, 2026. The linked authority identifier is Q21394911. Authority coordinates are 52.424, 30.921. 2 of 3 selected statements include explicit references; 0 carry qualifiers and 0 use preferred rank. The first chronological checks are 1963, 1965, 1968 and 2010.

Critical limits

Overview language is designed for orientation and should not be treated as a substitute for the evidence cited beneath it. The lead is largely declarative, so disagreement and counter-evidence require a deliberate search beyond the opening account. Authority statements aid reconciliation but still require their own references, qualifiers and ranks to be checked.

How to read it

Use the entry as an orientation point, then follow its citations and revision history. Names, dates and institutional relationships should be checked against the original record.

Best used for
  • Subject orientation
  • Search vocabulary
  • Locating named sources
Verify next

The closest primary source, responsible institution and strongest cited specialist reference.

Three-step research path

  1. Establish the record: confirm the title “Tsentrolit”, its source revision and the description used here.
  2. Expand the search: follow Tsentrolit primary sources, Tsentrolit archive and Tsentrolit research across catalogues and specialist indexes.
  3. Test the account: compare the strongest cited source with the responsible institution’s current record and note any disagreement.

Questions for further research

  1. Which source most directly establishes the central claim about “Tsentrolit”?
  2. Which institution is responsible for the underlying evidence?
  3. What terminology or title could unlock a more precise catalogue search?
Subject index

Search terms from this dossier

Source & attribution

This entry incorporates text from Tsentrolit” on English Wikipedia. Contributors are listed in the page history. Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 License. Selected authority identifiers and statements are retrieved from Wikidata under CC0; their references and qualifiers remain part of the verification path.