CACrown ArchivesThe cinema collection
Menu
Research dossier · General Reference

Fay's trisecant identity

identity between theta functions of Riemann surfaces

Cross-disciplinary reference desk with index cards, atlas, dictionary and catalogue
General referenceInterpretive dossier study · Crown Archives visual atlas
Record originEnglish Wikipedia
Text licenseCC BY-SA 4.0
Source revisionJul 7, 2026
Entity authorityQ5438875
Source-derived summary

In algebraic geometry, Fay's trisecant identity is an identity between theta functions of Riemann surfaces introduced by John Fay. Fay's identity holds for theta functions of Jacobians of curves, but not for theta functions of general abelian varieties.

The name "trisecant identity" refers to the geometric interpretation given by David Mumford, who used it to show that the Kummer variety of a genus

g

{\displaystyle g}

Riemann surface, given by the image of the map from the Jacobian to projective space of dimension

2

g

1

{\displaystyle 2^{g}-1}

induced by theta functions of order 2, has a 4-dimensional space of trisecants.

Statement

Suppose that

C

{\displaystyle C}

is a compact Riemann surface,

g

{\displaystyle g}

is the genus of

C

{\displaystyle C}

,

θ

:

C

g

C

{\displaystyle \theta :\mathbb {C} ^{g}\to \mathbb {C} }

is the Riemann theta function of

C

{\displaystyle C}

,

E

{\displaystyle E}

is a prime form on

C

×

C

{\displaystyle C\times C}

,

u

{\displaystyle u}

,

v

{\displaystyle v}

,

x

{\displaystyle x}

,

y

{\displaystyle y}

are points of

C

{\displaystyle C}

,

z

{\displaystyle z}

is an element of

C

g

{\displaystyle \mathbb {C} ^{g}}

, and

ω

{\displaystyle \omega }

is a 1-form on

C

{\displaystyle C}

with values in

C

g

{\displaystyle \mathbb {C} ^{g}}

.

Then Fay's identity states that

E

(

x

,

v

)

E

(

u

,

y

)

θ

(

z

+

u

x

ω

)

θ

(

z

+

v

y

ω

)

E

(

x

,

u

)

E

(

v

,

y

)

θ

(

z

+

v

x

ω

)

θ

(

z

+

u

y

ω

)

=

E

(

x

,

y

)

E

(

u

,

v

)

θ

(

z

)

θ

(

z

+

u

+

v

x

+

y

ω

)

{\displaystyle {\begin{aligned}E(x,v)E(u,y)\theta {\bigg (}z+\int _{u}^{x}\omega {\bigg )}\theta {\bigg (}z+\int _{v}^{y}\omega {\bigg )}&-E(x,u)E(v,y)\theta {\bigg (}z+\int _{v}^{x}\omega {\bigg )}\theta {\bigg (}z+\int _{u}^{y}\omega {\bigg )}\\[5pt]&=E(x,y)E(u,v)\theta (z)\theta {\bigg (}z+\int _{u+v}^{x+y}\omega {\bigg )}\end{aligned}}}

with

u

+

v

x

+

y

ω

=

u

x

ω

+

v

y

ω

=

u

y

ω

+

v

x

ω

.

Editorial summary

Begin with the source’s own compact description: “Fay's trisecant identity” is identity between theta functions of Riemann surfaces. The dossier treats that line as a proposition to test through Fay's, trisecant and identity, not as a finished interpretation.

Editorial reviewA concise reference frame for defining the subject, testing terminology and identifying the institution closest to the evidence. The current 375-word lead offers orientation but no explicit four-digit date, so chronology should not be assumed. The selected authority fields contribute no independent date. For this dossier, Fay's, trisecant and identity is the immediate research focus.
Editorial analysis

Why this record matters

The phrase “identity between theta functions of Riemann surfaces” supplies a clear boundary for inquiry. It also exposes the unanswered questions: who defined that boundary, when it became stable and which sources sit outside it.

Evidence profile

Named sources, stable identifiers and responsible institutions provide the strongest route from overview to verifiable evidence. The source revision retrieved here is dated Jul 7, 2026. The linked authority identifier is Q5438875. None of the 0 selected statements returned an explicit reference.

Critical limits

The absence of detail may reflect summary conventions rather than a lack of surviving documentation. The lead is largely declarative, so disagreement and counter-evidence require a deliberate search beyond the opening account. Authority statements aid reconciliation but still require their own references, qualifiers and ranks to be checked.

How to read it

Use the entry as an orientation point, then follow its citations and revision history. Names, dates and institutional relationships should be checked against the original record.

Best used for
  • Subject orientation
  • Search vocabulary
  • Locating named sources
Verify next

The closest primary source, responsible institution and strongest cited specialist reference.

Three-step research path

  1. Establish the record: confirm the title “Fay's trisecant identity”, its source revision and the description used here.
  2. Expand the search: follow Fay's trisecant identity primary sources, Fay's trisecant identity archive and Fay's research across catalogues and specialist indexes.
  3. Test the account: compare the strongest cited source with the responsible institution’s current record and note any disagreement.

Questions for further research

  1. Which source most directly establishes the central claim about “Fay's trisecant identity”?
  2. What terminology or title could unlock a more precise catalogue search?
  3. Which cited source is closest to the event, object or claim?
Subject index

Search terms from this dossier

Source & attribution

This entry incorporates text from Fay's trisecant identity” on English Wikipedia. Contributors are listed in the page history. Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 License. Selected authority identifiers and statements are retrieved from Wikidata under CC0; their references and qualifiers remain part of the verification path.