CACrown ArchivesThe cinema collection
Menu
Research dossier · General Reference

Exact trigonometric values

irrational number produced by taking the sine or cosine of a rational multiple of a full circle

Cross-disciplinary reference desk with index cards, atlas, dictionary and catalogue
General referenceInterpretive dossier study · Crown Archives visual atlas
Record originEnglish Wikipedia
Text licenseCC BY-SA 4.0
Source revisionSep 1, 2026
Entity authorityQ7841831
Source-derived summary

In mathematics, the values of the trigonometric functions can be expressed approximately, as in

cos

(

π

/

4

)

0.707

{\displaystyle \cos(\pi /4)\approx 0.707}

, or exactly, as in

cos

(

π

/

4

)

=

2

/

2

{\displaystyle \cos(\pi /4)={\sqrt {2}}/2}

. While trigonometric tables contain many approximate values, the exact values for certain angles can be expressed by a combination of arithmetic operations and square roots. The angles with trigonometric values that are expressible in this way are exactly those that can be constructed with a compass and straight edge, and the values are called constructible numbers.

Common angles

The trigonometric functions of angles that are multiples of 15°, 18°, or 22.5° have simple algebraic values. These values are listed in the following table for angles from 0° to 45° (see below for proofs). In the table below, the label "Undefined" represents a ratio

1

:

0.

{\displaystyle 1:0.}

If the codomain of the trigonometric functions is taken to be the real numbers these entries are undefined, whereas if the codomain is taken to be the projectively extended real numbers, these entries take the value

{\displaystyle \infty }

(see division by zero).

For angles outside of this range, trigonometric values can be found by applying reflection and shift identities, such as

sin

(

π

2

θ

)

=

cos

(

θ

)

,

sin

(

2

π

+

θ

)

=

sin

(

π

θ

)

=

sin

(

θ

)

,

sin

(

π

+

θ

)

=

sin

(

θ

)

=

sin

(

θ

)

,

cos

(

2

π

+

θ

)

=

cos

(

θ

)

=

cos

(

θ

)

,

cos

(

π

+

θ

)

=

cos

(

π

θ

)

=

cos

(

θ

)

.

{\displaystyle {\begin{alignedat}{3}&&\sin({\tfrac {\pi }{2}}-\theta )&{}=\cos(\theta ),\\[5mu]&&\sin(2\pi +\theta )&{}=\sin(\pi -\theta )&&{}=\sin(\theta ),\quad &&\sin(\pi +\theta )&&{}=\sin(-\theta )&&{}=-\sin(\theta ),\\[5mu]&&\cos(2\pi +\theta )&{}=\cos(-\theta )&&{}=\cos(\theta ),\quad &&\cos(\pi +\theta )&&{}=\cos(\pi -\theta )&&{}=-\cos(\theta ).\end{alignedat}}}

For example, for any θ greater than ⁠π/4⁠, to find its sine, follow these steps to instead operate within the range of 0 to ⁠π/4⁠:

While it is greater than 2π, subtract 2π from it. Now try to find sin(θ).

Editorial summary

Begin with the source’s own compact description: “Exact trigonometric values” is irrational number produced by taking the sine or cosine of a rational multiple of a full circle. The dossier treats that line as a proposition to test through Exact, trigonometric and values, not as a finished interpretation.

Editorial reviewA dependable orientation record for establishing vocabulary, names and a first evidence trail. The current 390-word lead offers orientation but no explicit four-digit date, so chronology should not be assumed. The selected authority fields contribute no independent date. For this dossier, Exact, trigonometric and values is the immediate research focus.
Editorial analysis

Why this record matters

The phrase “irrational number produced by taking the sine or cosine of a rational multiple of a full circle” supplies a clear boundary for inquiry. It also exposes the unanswered questions: who defined that boundary, when it became stable and which sources sit outside it.

Evidence profile

Named sources, stable identifiers and responsible institutions provide the strongest route from overview to verifiable evidence. The source revision retrieved here is dated Sep 1, 2026. The linked authority identifier is Q7841831. None of the 0 selected statements returned an explicit reference.

Critical limits

The absence of detail may reflect summary conventions rather than a lack of surviving documentation. The source lead contains qualifying language; that uncertainty should survive quotation, summary and reuse. Authority statements aid reconciliation but still require their own references, qualifiers and ranks to be checked.

How to read it

Use the entry as an orientation point, then follow its citations and revision history. Names, dates and institutional relationships should be checked against the original record.

Best used for
  • Subject orientation
  • Search vocabulary
  • Locating named sources
Verify next

The closest primary source, responsible institution and strongest cited specialist reference.

Three-step research path

  1. Establish the record: confirm the title “Exact trigonometric values”, its source revision and the description used here.
  2. Expand the search: follow Exact trigonometric values primary sources, Exact trigonometric values archive and Exact research across catalogues and specialist indexes.
  3. Test the account: compare the strongest cited source with the responsible institution’s current record and note any disagreement.

Questions for further research

  1. Which source most directly establishes the central claim about “Exact trigonometric values”?
  2. Which institution is responsible for the underlying evidence?
  3. Which cited source is closest to the event, object or claim?
Subject index

Search terms from this dossier

Source & attribution

This entry incorporates text from Exact trigonometric values” on English Wikipedia. Contributors are listed in the page history. Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 License. Selected authority identifiers and statements are retrieved from Wikidata under CC0; their references and qualifiers remain part of the verification path.