CACrown ArchivesThe cinema collection
Menu
Research dossier · Science & Nature

Trictenotoma

genus of insects

Specimen drawers, botanical folios and brass scientific instruments under study light
Science and natureInterpretive dossier study · Crown Archives visual atlas
Record originEnglish Wikipedia
Text licenseCC BY-SA 4.0
Source revisionOct 2, 2025
Entity authorityQ16993222
Source-derived summary

Trictenotoma is a genus of beetle in the Trictenotomidae family. They have scales covering the elytra that fluoresce under ultraviolet light. Based on similarities in the larval characteristics, the family is thought to be closely related to the Salpingidae.

Species

Trictenotoma childreni Gray, 1832

Trictenotoma cindarella Kriesche, 1921

Trictenotoma davidi Deyrolle, 1875

Trictenotoma formosana Kriesche, 1920

Trictenotoma grayi Smith, 1851

Trictenotoma lansbergi Dohrn, 1882

Trictenotoma mniszechi Deyrolle, 1875

Trictenotoma mouhoti Deyrolle, 1875

Trictenotoma pollocki Telnov & Drumont, 2020

Trictenotoma templetoni Westwood, 1848

Trictenotoma westwoodi Deyrolle, 1875

References

External links

Biolib

Joel Hallan's Biology Catalog — Texas A&M Univ.

Editorial summary

This brief starts where responsible research should: with the source description of “Trictenotoma” as genus of insects. Everything that follows is an evidence route, not borrowed authority.

Editorial reviewA sound reference starting point where classification, measurement and the date of the underlying evidence remain visible. The current lead gives the account dated anchors—1832, 1921, 1875, 1920—that can be checked directly. The selected authority fields contribute no independent date. The account is most persuasive where Trictenotoma, genus and insects can be independently traced.
Editorial analysis

Why this record matters

The subject matters to the science & nature register because the source frames it as genus of insects. Its deeper value depends on whether names, dates, institutions and citations support that framing.

Evidence profile

The date and method of observation matter as much as the stated conclusion, especially where classification or consensus has changed. The source revision retrieved here is dated Oct 2, 2025. The linked authority identifier is Q16993222. None of the 0 selected statements returned an explicit reference. The first chronological checks are 1832, 1921, 1875 and 1920.

Critical limits

Current terminology should not be projected backward without checking the classification used when the underlying evidence was created. The lead is largely declarative, so disagreement and counter-evidence require a deliberate search beyond the opening account. Authority statements aid reconciliation but still require their own references, qualifiers and ranks to be checked.

How to read it

Check terminology, classification and the date of the cited evidence. Scientific names and technical consensus can change while older records retain historical value.

Best used for
  • Current terminology
  • Classification context
  • Finding cited technical literature
Verify next

Primary datasets, specimen catalogues, standards bodies and the most recent peer-reviewed literature.

Three-step research path

  1. Establish the record: confirm the title “Trictenotoma”, its source revision and the description used here.
  2. Expand the search: follow Trictenotoma primary sources, Trictenotoma archive and Trictenotoma research across catalogues and specialist indexes.
  3. Test the account: compare the strongest cited source with the responsible institution’s current record and note any disagreement.

Questions for further research

  1. Which source most directly establishes the central claim about “Trictenotoma”?
  2. Is the terminology current, historical or disputed?
  3. Which observation, specimen, dataset or publication supports the account?
Subject index

Search terms from this dossier

Source & attribution

This entry incorporates text from Trictenotoma” on English Wikipedia. Contributors are listed in the page history. Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 License. Selected authority identifiers and statements are retrieved from Wikidata under CC0; their references and qualifiers remain part of the verification path.