CACrown ArchivesThe cinema collection
EN/FR
Search
Menu
Research dossier · General Reference

Treaty of Compiègne (867)

867

Cross-disciplinary reference desk with index cards, atlas, dictionary and catalogue
General referenceInterpretive dossier study · Crown Archives visual atlas
Record originEnglish Wikipedia
Text licenseCC BY-SA 4.0
Source revisionNov 30, 2024
Entity authorityQ3536776 ↗
Source-derived summary

The Treaty of Compiègne was an August 867 agreement in which King Charles the Bald ceded the peninsula of Cotentin to King Salomon of Brittany. Though not specified in the treaty, the territory of Avranchin, including Mont Saint-Michel, was likely included in the concession.

Editorial summary

Begin with the source’s own compact description: “Treaty of Compiègne (867)” is 867. The dossier treats that line as a proposition to test through Treaty and Compiègne, not as a finished interpretation.

Editorial reviewA concise reference frame for defining the subject, testing terminology and identifying the institution closest to the evidence. The current 44-word lead offers orientation but no explicit four-digit date, so chronology should not be assumed. The selected authority fields contribute no independent date. For this dossier, Treaty and Compiègne is the immediate research focus.
Editorial analysis

Why this record matters

The phrase “867” supplies a clear boundary for inquiry. It also exposes the unanswered questions: who defined that boundary, when it became stable and which sources sit outside it.

Evidence profile

Vocabulary and entity names are the principal evidence signals here, because they determine the precision of every later search. The source revision retrieved here is dated Nov 30, 2024. The linked authority identifier is Q3536776. None of the 0 selected statements returned an explicit reference.

Critical limits

A concise general-reference account can conceal disagreements about scope, terminology or the weight assigned to individual sources. The lead is largely declarative, so disagreement and counter-evidence require a deliberate search beyond the opening account. Authority statements aid reconciliation but still require their own references, qualifiers and ranks to be checked.

How to read it

Use the entry as an orientation point, then follow its citations and revision history. Names, dates and institutional relationships should be checked against the original record.

Best used for
  • Subject orientation
  • Search vocabulary
  • Locating named sources
Verify next

The closest primary source, responsible institution and strongest cited specialist reference.

Three-step research path

  1. Establish the record: confirm the title “Treaty of Compiègne (867)”, its source revision and the description used here.
  2. Expand the search: follow Treaty of Compiègne (867) primary sources, Treaty of Compiègne (867) archive and Treaty research across catalogues and specialist indexes.
  3. Test the account: compare the strongest cited source with the responsible institution’s current record and note any disagreement.

Questions for further research

  1. Which source most directly establishes the central claim about “Treaty of Compiègne (867)”?
  2. What terminology or title could unlock a more precise catalogue search?
  3. Which cited source is closest to the event, object or claim?
Subject index

Search terms from this dossier

Source & attribution

This entry incorporates text from “Treaty of Compiègne (867)” on English Wikipedia. Contributors are listed in the page history. Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 License. Selected authority identifiers and statements are retrieved from Wikidata under CC0; their references and qualifiers remain part of the verification path.