Traveller Double Adventure 4: Marooned/Marooned Alone
science fiction role-playing game supplement

Traveller Double Adventure 4: Marooned/Marooned Alone is two tabletop role-playing game adventures, written by Loren K. Wiseman for Traveller, and published in tête-bêche format by Game Designers' Workshop in 1981.
Plot summary
Marooned/Marooned Alone is an adventure in which the player characterss must travel by foot through the wilderness on the planet Pagliacci in the Solomani Rim, dealing with its harsh weather and treacherous landscapes while being pursued.
Reception
William A. Barton reviewed Marooned/Marooned Alone in The Space Gamer No. 46. Barton commented that "if your players haven't tired of planetary journeys after Across the Bright Face/Mission on Mithril and Twilight's Peak, they'll find a welcome challenge in Marooned/Marooned Alone."
Bob McWilliams reviewed Marooned/Marooned Alone for White Dwarf #28, giving it an overall rating of 10 out of 10 for the novice (and 9 for the expert), and stated that "this movement system is a rules addition that has long been required, and should have been in the basic rules set.
The public source identifies “Traveller Double Adventure 4: Marooned/Marooned Alone” as science fiction role-playing game supplement. This brief keeps that definition visible, then builds a research path around Traveller, Double and Adventure.
Why this record matters
A short description can identify a subject without explaining its stakes. For “Traveller Double Adventure 4: Marooned/Marooned Alone”, the useful work is to connect “science fiction role-playing game supplement” to the records capable of establishing context and consequence.
Vocabulary and entity names are the principal evidence signals here, because they determine the precision of every later search. The source revision retrieved here is dated Sep 28, 2023. The linked authority identifier is Q85810545. None of the 1 selected statements returned an explicit reference. The first chronological checks are 1981.
A concise general-reference account can conceal disagreements about scope, terminology or the weight assigned to individual sources. The lead is largely declarative, so disagreement and counter-evidence require a deliberate search beyond the opening account. Authority statements aid reconciliation but still require their own references, qualifiers and ranks to be checked.
How to read it
Use the entry as an orientation point, then follow its citations and revision history. Names, dates and institutional relationships should be checked against the original record.
- Subject orientation
- Search vocabulary
- Locating named sources
The closest primary source, responsible institution and strongest cited specialist reference.
Three-step research path
- Establish the record: confirm the title “Traveller Double Adventure 4: Marooned/Marooned Alone”, its source revision and the description used here.
- Expand the search: follow Traveller Double Adventure 4: Marooned/Marooned Alone primary sources, Traveller Double Adventure 4: Marooned/Marooned Alone archive and Traveller research across catalogues and specialist indexes.
- Test the account: compare the strongest cited source with the responsible institution’s current record and note any disagreement.
Questions for further research
- Which source most directly establishes the central claim about “Traveller Double Adventure 4: Marooned/Marooned Alone”?
- Which cited source is closest to the event, object or claim?
- Which institution is responsible for the underlying evidence?
Search terms from this dossier
This entry incorporates text from “Traveller Double Adventure 4: Marooned/Marooned Alone” on English Wikipedia. Contributors are listed in the page history. Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 License. Selected authority identifiers and statements are retrieved from Wikidata under CC0; their references and qualifiers remain part of the verification path.