CACrown ArchivesThe cinema collection
Menu
Research dossier · General Reference

Transylvania lottery

mathematical concept

Cross-disciplinary reference desk with index cards, atlas, dictionary and catalogue
General referenceInterpretive dossier study · Crown Archives visual atlas
Record originEnglish Wikipedia
Text licenseCC BY-SA 4.0
Source revisionAug 13, 2026
Entity authorityQ7835490 ↗
Source-derived summary

In mathematical combinatorics, the Transylvania lottery is a lottery where players select three numbers from 1 to 14 for each ticket, and then three numbers are chosen randomly. A ticket wins if two of the numbers match the random ones. The problem asks how many tickets the player must buy in order to be certain of winning.

(Javier Martínez, Gloria Gutiérrez & Pablo Cordero et al. 2008, p.85)(Mazur 2010, p.280 problem 15)

An upper bound can be given using the Fano plane with a collection of 14 tickets in two sets of seven. Each set of seven uses every line of a Fano plane, labelled with the numbers 1 to 7, and 8 to 14.

At least two of the three randomly chosen numbers must be in one Fano plane set, and any two points on a Fano plane are on a line, so there will be a ticket in the collection containing those two numbers. There is a ⁠6/13⁠×⁠5/12⁠=⁠5/26⁠ chance that all three randomly chosen numbers are in the same Fano plane set. In this case, there is a ⁠1/5⁠ chance that they are on a line, and hence all three numbers are on one ticket, otherwise each of the three pairs are on three different tickets.

See also

Combinatorial design

Lottery Wheeling

References

Martínez, Javier; Gutiérrez, Gloria; Cordero, Pablo; Rodríguez, Francisco J.; Merino, Salvador (2008), "Algebraic topics on discrete mathematics", in Moore, Kenneth B. (ed.), Discrete mathematics research progress, Hauppauge, NY: Nova Sci.

Editorial summary

Begin with the source’s own compact description: “Transylvania lottery” is mathematical concept. The dossier treats that line as a proposition to test through Transylvania, lottery and mathematical, not as a finished interpretation.

Editorial reviewA concise reference frame for defining the subject, testing terminology and identifying the institution closest to the evidence. The current lead gives the account dated anchors—2008, 2010—that can be checked directly. The selected authority fields contribute no independent date. For this dossier, Transylvania, lottery and mathematical is the immediate research focus.
Editorial analysis

Why this record matters

The phrase “mathematical concept” supplies a clear boundary for inquiry. It also exposes the unanswered questions: who defined that boundary, when it became stable and which sources sit outside it.

Evidence profile

The citation trail is more important than the brevity of the summary: it shows where individual claims can be examined in context. The source revision retrieved here is dated Aug 13, 2026. The linked authority identifier is Q7835490. None of the 0 selected statements returned an explicit reference. The first chronological checks are 2008 and 2010.

Critical limits

The absence of detail may reflect summary conventions rather than a lack of surviving documentation. The lead is largely declarative, so disagreement and counter-evidence require a deliberate search beyond the opening account. Authority statements aid reconciliation but still require their own references, qualifiers and ranks to be checked.

How to read it

Use the entry as an orientation point, then follow its citations and revision history. Names, dates and institutional relationships should be checked against the original record.

Best used for
  • Subject orientation
  • Search vocabulary
  • Locating named sources
Verify next

The closest primary source, responsible institution and strongest cited specialist reference.

Three-step research path

  1. Establish the record: confirm the title “Transylvania lottery”, its source revision and the description used here.
  2. Expand the search: follow Transylvania lottery primary sources, Transylvania lottery archive and Transylvania research across catalogues and specialist indexes.
  3. Test the account: compare the strongest cited source with the responsible institution’s current record and note any disagreement.

Questions for further research

  1. Which source most directly establishes the central claim about “Transylvania lottery”?
  2. Which institution is responsible for the underlying evidence?
  3. Which cited source is closest to the event, object or claim?
Subject index

Search terms from this dossier

Source & attribution

This entry incorporates text from “Transylvania lottery” on English Wikipedia. Contributors are listed in the page history. Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 License. Selected authority identifiers and statements are retrieved from Wikidata under CC0; their references and qualifiers remain part of the verification path.