Shriek map
Exceptional functor

In category theory, a branch of mathematics, certain unusual functors are denoted
f
!
{\displaystyle f_{!}}
and
f
!
,
{\displaystyle f^{!},}
with the exclamation mark used to indicate that they are exceptional in some way. They are thus accordingly sometimes called shriek maps, with "shriek" being slang for an exclamation mark, though other terms are used, depending on context.
Usage
Shriek notation is used in two senses:
To distinguish a functor from a more usual functor
f
∗
{\displaystyle f_{*}}
or
f
∗
,
{\displaystyle f^{*},}
accordingly as it is covariant or contravariant.
To indicate a map that goes "the wrong way" – a functor that has the same objects as a more familiar functor, but behaves differently on maps and has the opposite variance. For example, it has a pull-back where one expects a push-forward.
Examples
In algebraic geometry, these arise in image functors for sheaves, particularly
Verdier duality, where
f
!
{\displaystyle f_{!}}
is a "less usual" functor.
In algebraic topology, these arise particularly in fiber bundles, where they yield maps that have the opposite of the usual variance.
This brief starts where responsible research should: with the source description of “Shriek map” as exceptional functor. Everything that follows is an evidence route, not borrowed authority.
Why this record matters
The subject matters to the general reference register because the source frames it as exceptional functor. Its deeper value depends on whether names, dates, institutions and citations support that framing.
The citation trail is more important than the brevity of the summary: it shows where individual claims can be examined in context. The source revision retrieved here is dated Dec 22, 2025. The linked authority identifier is Q7503941. None of the 0 selected statements returned an explicit reference.
A concise general-reference account can conceal disagreements about scope, terminology or the weight assigned to individual sources. The lead is largely declarative, so disagreement and counter-evidence require a deliberate search beyond the opening account. Authority statements aid reconciliation but still require their own references, qualifiers and ranks to be checked.
How to read it
Use the entry as an orientation point, then follow its citations and revision history. Names, dates and institutional relationships should be checked against the original record.
- Subject orientation
- Search vocabulary
- Locating named sources
The closest primary source, responsible institution and strongest cited specialist reference.
Three-step research path
- Establish the record: confirm the title “Shriek map”, its source revision and the description used here.
- Expand the search: follow Shriek map primary sources, Shriek map archive and Shriek research across catalogues and specialist indexes.
- Test the account: compare the strongest cited source with the responsible institution’s current record and note any disagreement.
Questions for further research
- Which source most directly establishes the central claim about “Shriek map”?
- What terminology or title could unlock a more precise catalogue search?
- Which cited source is closest to the event, object or claim?
Search terms from this dossier
This entry incorporates text from “Shriek map” on English Wikipedia. Contributors are listed in the page history. Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 License. Selected authority identifiers and statements are retrieved from Wikidata under CC0; their references and qualifiers remain part of the verification path.