CACrown ArchivesThe cinema collection
Menu
Research dossier · General Reference

Touche baronets

baronetcy in the Baronetage of the United Kingdom

Cross-disciplinary reference desk with index cards, atlas, dictionary and catalogue
General referenceInterpretive dossier study · Crown Archives visual atlas
Record originEnglish Wikipedia
Text licenseCC BY-SA 4.0
Source revisionJan 27, 2023
Entity authorityQ7828689
Source-derived summary

There have been baronetcies created for members of the Touche family from Surrey, both in the Baronetage of the United Kingdom. Both creations are extant as of 2010.

The Touche Baronetcy, of Westcott in the County of Surrey, was created in the Baronetage of the United Kingdom on 5 July 1920 for the accountant and Conservative politician George Touche. The third Baronet was Deputy Chairman of National Westminster Bank between 1977 and 1987.

The Touche Baronetcy, of Dorking in the County of Surrey, was created in the Baronetage of the United Kingdom on 3 July 1962 for the Conservative politician Gordon Touche. He was Chairman of Ways and Means between 1960 and 1962. Touche was the third son of the first Baronet of the 1920 creation. As of 2017 the title is held by his grandson, the third Baronet, who succeeded in 2017.

Touche baronets, of Westcott (1920)

Sir George Alexander Touche, 1st Baronet (1861–1935)

Sir Norman George Touche, 2nd Baronet (1888–1977)

Sir Anthony George Touche, 3rd Baronet (1927–2018)

Sir William George Touche, 4th Baronet (born 1962)

The heir apparent is the present holder's son Harry George Touche (born 1992).

Touche baronets, of Dorking (1962)

Sir Gordon Cosmo Touche, 1st Baronet (1895–1972)

Sir Rodney Gordon Touche, 2nd Baronet (1928–2017)

Sir Eric MacLellan Touche, 3rd Baronet (born 1960)

The heir apparent is Braden Stringer Touche (born 1990), only son of the 3rd Baronet.

Editorial summary

This brief starts where responsible research should: with the source description of “Touche baronets” as baronetcy in the Baronetage of the United Kingdom. Everything that follows is an evidence route, not borrowed authority.

Editorial reviewA concise reference frame for defining the subject, testing terminology and identifying the institution closest to the evidence. The current lead gives the account dated anchors—2010, 1920, 1977, 1987—that can be checked directly. The selected authority fields contribute no independent date. The account is most persuasive where Touche, baronets and baronetcy can be independently traced.
Editorial analysis

Why this record matters

The subject matters to the general reference register because the source frames it as baronetcy in the Baronetage of the United Kingdom. Its deeper value depends on whether names, dates, institutions and citations support that framing.

Evidence profile

The citation trail is more important than the brevity of the summary: it shows where individual claims can be examined in context. The source revision retrieved here is dated Jan 27, 2023. The linked authority identifier is Q7828689. None of the 0 selected statements returned an explicit reference. The first chronological checks are 2010, 1920, 1977 and 1987.

Critical limits

The absence of detail may reflect summary conventions rather than a lack of surviving documentation. The lead is largely declarative, so disagreement and counter-evidence require a deliberate search beyond the opening account. Authority statements aid reconciliation but still require their own references, qualifiers and ranks to be checked.

How to read it

Use the entry as an orientation point, then follow its citations and revision history. Names, dates and institutional relationships should be checked against the original record.

Best used for
  • Subject orientation
  • Search vocabulary
  • Locating named sources
Verify next

The closest primary source, responsible institution and strongest cited specialist reference.

Three-step research path

  1. Establish the record: confirm the title “Touche baronets”, its source revision and the description used here.
  2. Expand the search: follow Touche baronets primary sources, Touche baronets archive and Touche research across catalogues and specialist indexes.
  3. Test the account: compare the strongest cited source with the responsible institution’s current record and note any disagreement.

Questions for further research

  1. Which source most directly establishes the central claim about “Touche baronets”?
  2. Which institution is responsible for the underlying evidence?
  3. Which cited source is closest to the event, object or claim?
Subject index

Search terms from this dossier

Source & attribution

This entry incorporates text from Touche baronets” on English Wikipedia. Contributors are listed in the page history. Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 License. Selected authority identifiers and statements are retrieved from Wikidata under CC0; their references and qualifiers remain part of the verification path.