CACrown ArchivesHistory · sources · collections
Menu
Research dossier · General Reference

Total average

Open-knowledge reference entry

Cross-disciplinary reference desk with index cards, atlas, dictionary and catalogue
General referenceInterpretive dossier study · Crown Archives visual atlas
Record originEnglish Wikipedia
Text licenseCC BY-SA 4.0
Source revisionOct 20, 2024
Entity authorityQ7828095
Source-derived summary

Total average is a baseball statistic devised by sportswriter Thomas Boswell and introduced in 1978. It was also described in his 1982 article "Welcome to the world of Total Average where a walk is as good as a hit". It is designed to measure a hitter's overall offensive contributions, on the basis that "all bases are created equal". The statistic was included in issues of Inside Sports.

The definition of the statistic is simple. A player gets a credit for every base accumulated and a penalty for every out made. So a player gets one credit for a single, walk, stolen base or being hit by a pitch; two for a double; three for a triple; and four for a home run. A player's total average is calculated by summing the accumulated bases and dividing by the number of outs the player makes.

Formula

When initially announced in an article in Inside Sports, the formula for total average was:

T

A

=

T

B

+

H

B

P

+

B

B

+

S

B

A

B

+

H

B

P

+

B

B

+

S

B

+

C

S

{\displaystyle TA={\frac {TB+HBP+BB+SB}{AB+HBP+BB+SB+CS}}}

Boswell revised the formula, which by 1981 had been modified to its final form:

T

A

=

T

B

+

H

B

P

+

B

B

+

S

B

A

B

H

+

C

S

+

G

I

D

P

{\displaystyle TA={\frac {TB+HBP+BB+SB}{AB-H+CS+GIDP}}}

where

TA = Total average

TB = Total bases

HBP = Hit by pitch

BB = Walks

SB = Stolen base

CS = Caught stealing

AB = At bats

H = Hits

GIDP = Grounded into double play

Like OPS, total average gives credit to players who draw a lot of walks and hit with a lot of power, such as Babe Ruth, Barry Bonds, Ted Williams and Frank Thomas.

Reception

Bill James was critical of total average, stating the "all bases are created unequal".

Editorial summary

Begin with the source’s own compact description: “Total average” is open-knowledge reference entry. The dossier treats that line as a proposition to test through Total, average and Open-knowledge, not as a finished interpretation.

Editorial reviewA dependable orientation record for establishing vocabulary, names and a first evidence trail. The current lead gives the account dated anchors—1978, 1982, 1981—that can be checked directly. The selected authority fields contribute no independent date. For this dossier, Total, average and Open-knowledge is the immediate research focus.
Editorial analysis

Why this record matters

The phrase “open-knowledge reference entry” supplies a clear boundary for inquiry. It also exposes the unanswered questions: who defined that boundary, when it became stable and which sources sit outside it.

Evidence profile

Named sources, stable identifiers and responsible institutions provide the strongest route from overview to verifiable evidence. The source revision retrieved here is dated Oct 20, 2024. The linked authority identifier is Q7828095. None of the 0 selected statements returned an explicit reference. The first chronological checks are 1978, 1982 and 1981.

Critical limits

Overview language is designed for orientation and should not be treated as a substitute for the evidence cited beneath it. The lead is largely declarative, so disagreement and counter-evidence require a deliberate search beyond the opening account. Authority statements aid reconciliation but still require their own references, qualifiers and ranks to be checked.

How to read it

Use the entry as an orientation point, then follow its citations and revision history. Names, dates and institutional relationships should be checked against the original record.

Best used for
  • Subject orientation
  • Search vocabulary
  • Locating named sources
Verify next

The closest primary source, responsible institution and strongest cited specialist reference.

Three-step research path

  1. Establish the record: confirm the title “Total average”, its source revision and the description used here.
  2. Expand the search: follow Total average primary sources, Total average archive and Total research across catalogues and specialist indexes.
  3. Test the account: compare the strongest cited source with the responsible institution’s current record and note any disagreement.

Questions for further research

  1. Which source most directly establishes the central claim about “Total average”?
  2. What terminology or title could unlock a more precise catalogue search?
  3. Which cited source is closest to the event, object or claim?
Subject index

Search terms from this dossier

Source & attribution

This entry incorporates text from Total average” on English Wikipedia. Contributors are listed in the page history. Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 License. Selected authority identifiers and statements are retrieved from Wikidata under CC0; their references and qualifiers remain part of the verification path.