Moubray Bay
bay in the western Ross Sea, Antarctica

Moubray Bay (72°11′S 170°15′E) is a bay in the western Ross Sea, indenting the coast of Victoria Land, Antarctica, between Cape Roget and Cape Hallett. It was discovered in 1841 by Sir James Clark Ross and named by him for George H. Moubray, clerk in charge of the expedition ship Terror.
Location
Cape Roget, the northern point of the bay, is the southern point on the Adare Peninsula.
To the west of Cape Roget the Moubray Glacier flows south to the bay from the Adare Saddle.
The DeAngelo Glacier and Slone Glacier are its tributaries, running southeast from the Admiralty Mountains.
To their south, past Quartermain Point the Burnette Glacier enters the bay.
Further south, past Honeycomb Ridge, Copper Cove, Helm Point and Hedgehog Island, the Honeycomb Glacier and Ironside Glacier flow into the bay.
The Kirk Glacier is a right tributary of the Ironside Glacier.
South of this is Cape Christie at the entrance to Edisto Inlet, which is fed by the Manhaul Glacier and Edisto Glacier, which flows past Tombstone Hill and Felsite Island.
The Hallett Peninsula forms the southeast side of Edisto Inlet, with Hallett Station and Cape Hallett at its northern extreme.
This brief starts where responsible research should: with the source description of “Moubray Bay” as bay in the western Ross Sea, Antarctica. Everything that follows is an evidence route, not borrowed authority.
Why this record matters
The subject matters to the places & architecture register because the source frames it as bay in the western Ross Sea, Antarctica. Its deeper value depends on whether names, dates, institutions and citations support that framing.
The strongest evidence will usually combine a dated visual record with documents produced by the authority responsible for the place. The source revision retrieved here is dated Sep 24, 2026. The linked authority identifier is Q6918859. Authority coordinates are -72.183, 170.250. 1 of 1 selected statements include explicit references; 0 carry qualifiers and 0 use preferred rank. The first chronological checks are 1841.
Architectural summaries often privilege surviving fabric and can understate demolished phases, contested use or displaced communities. The lead is largely declarative, so disagreement and counter-evidence require a deliberate search beyond the opening account. Authority statements aid reconciliation but still require their own references, qualifiers and ranks to be checked.
How to read it
Treat names, boundaries and functions as historically changeable. Maps, plans, inventories and administrative records can clarify what the place meant at different dates.
- Historic place names
- Jurisdictional context
- Routes into maps and plans
Contemporary maps, plans, listed-building records, estate papers and the responsible local or national archive.
Three-step research path
- Establish the record: confirm the title “Moubray Bay”, its source revision and the description used here.
- Expand the search: follow Moubray Bay primary sources, Moubray Bay archive and Moubray research across catalogues and specialist indexes.
- Test the account: compare the strongest cited source with the responsible institution’s current record and note any disagreement.
Questions for further research
- Which source most directly establishes the central claim about “Moubray Bay”?
- Which authority defined the place, boundary or structure at the relevant date?
- What physical evidence or contemporary plan supports the description?
Search terms from this dossier
This entry incorporates text from “Moubray Bay” on English Wikipedia. Contributors are listed in the page history. Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 License. Selected authority identifiers and statements are retrieved from Wikidata under CC0; their references and qualifiers remain part of the verification path.