CACrown ArchivesThe cinema collection
Menu
Research dossier · People & Ideas

Ho Tze Lok

squash player

Correspondence, annotated notebooks and portrait silhouettes prepared for research
People and ideasInterpretive dossier study · Crown Archives visual atlas
Record originEnglish Wikipedia
Text licenseCC BY-SA 4.0
Source revisionJul 26, 2026
Entity authorityQ46713078
Source-derived summary

Ho Tze-Lok (Chinese: 何子樂, born 26 October 1995), also known as Tomato Ho, is a Hong Kong professional squash player. As of October 2024, she was ranked number 24 in the world, and her highest-ever PSA ranking was 21 in January 2024.

Career

Tze-Lok's wins include the 2017 City of Greater Bendigo International, Perrier Challenge Cup and Brisbane City Sandgate Open.

In 2018, she was part of the Hong Kong team that won the bronze medal at the 2018 Women's World Team Squash Championships.

In 2025, she captured the gold medal in the Asian Individual Squash Championships, marking consecutive three editions of the Women's championship won by three different Hong Kong players.

Editorial summary

“Ho Tze Lok” enters the record as squash player. Crown Archives preserves that source wording while asking what squash and player can confirm, complicate or overturn.

Editorial reviewA useful biographical orientation record, particularly for establishing names, roles and a first chronology. The current lead gives the account dated anchors—1995, 2024, 2017, 2018—that can be checked directly. The linked authority record independently contributes the date 1995-10-26. Its strongest next move is a source search built around squash and player.
Editorial analysis

Why this record matters

“Ho Tze Lok” is worth following because a concise public description often conceals a longer documentary argument. Here, squash and player provides the most credible route into that argument.

Evidence profile

Chronology provides the most reliable spine for this subject; interpretation should follow only after identities and dates are secure. The source revision retrieved here is dated Jul 26, 2026. The linked authority identifier is Q46713078. 1 of 1 selected statements include explicit references; 0 carry qualifiers and 0 use preferred rank. The first chronological checks are 1995, 2024, 2017 and 2018.

Critical limits

Public reputation and documentary evidence do not always develop together; absence from a summary is not evidence of historical absence. The lead is largely declarative, so disagreement and counter-evidence require a deliberate search beyond the opening account. Authority statements aid reconciliation but still require their own references, qualifiers and ranks to be checked.

How to read it

Read biographical claims against dates, named institutions and the cited references. Distinguish a subject’s later reputation from evidence produced during their lifetime.

Best used for
  • Establishing names and roles
  • Building a first chronology
  • Locating cited institutions
Verify next

Personal papers, civil or court records, institutional files and the scholarship cited by the source.

Three-step research path

  1. Establish the record: confirm the title “Ho Tze Lok”, its source revision and the description used here.
  2. Expand the search: follow Ho Tze Lok primary sources, Ho Tze Lok archive and squash research across catalogues and specialist indexes.
  3. Test the account: compare the strongest cited source with the responsible institution’s current record and note any disagreement.

Questions for further research

  1. Which source most directly establishes the central claim about “Ho Tze Lok”?
  2. Which claims depend on a single source or contested interpretation?
  3. How has the subject’s reputation changed across later accounts?
Subject index

Search terms from this dossier

Source & attribution

This entry incorporates text from Ho Tze Lok” on English Wikipedia. Contributors are listed in the page history. Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 License. Selected authority identifiers and statements are retrieved from Wikidata under CC0; their references and qualifiers remain part of the verification path.