CACrown ArchivesThe cinema collection
EN/FR
Search
Menu
Research dossier · People & Ideas

Tomas Chlubna

Czech ice Hockey player

Correspondence, annotated notebooks and portrait silhouettes prepared for research
People and ideasInterpretive dossier study · Crown Archives visual atlas
Record originEnglish Wikipedia
Text licenseCC BY-SA 4.0
Source revisionMay 20, 2026
Entity authorityQ7818293 ↗
Source-derived summary

Tomas Chlubna (born November 6, 1972) is a Czech former professional ice hockey player.

Chlubna played in the Czech Extraliga for HC Dukla Jihlava, HC Vítkovice, HC Železárny Třinec, HC Karlovy Vary and HC Znojemští Orli. He also played in the SM-liiga for JYP Jyväskylä and Tappara, the Russian Superleague for Metallurg Magnitogorsk and Severstal Cherepovets and the Slovak Extraliga for HC Slovan Bratislava.

Editorial summary

This brief starts where responsible research should: with the source description of “Tomas Chlubna” as czech ice Hockey player. Everything that follows is an evidence route, not borrowed authority.

Editorial reviewStrongest as a route into the people, institutions and dated events that shaped the subject’s public record. The current lead gives the account dated anchors—1972—that can be checked directly. The linked authority record independently contributes the date 1972-11-06. The account is most persuasive where Tomas, Chlubna and Czech can be independently traced.
Editorial analysis

Why this record matters

The subject matters to the people & ideas register because the source frames it as czech ice Hockey player. Its deeper value depends on whether names, dates, institutions and citations support that framing.

Evidence profile

Chronology provides the most reliable spine for this subject; interpretation should follow only after identities and dates are secure. The source revision retrieved here is dated May 20, 2026. The linked authority identifier is Q7818293. 1 of 1 selected statements include explicit references; 0 carry qualifiers and 0 use preferred rank. The first chronological checks are 1972.

Critical limits

Public reputation and documentary evidence do not always develop together; absence from a summary is not evidence of historical absence. The lead is largely declarative, so disagreement and counter-evidence require a deliberate search beyond the opening account. Authority statements aid reconciliation but still require their own references, qualifiers and ranks to be checked.

How to read it

Read biographical claims against dates, named institutions and the cited references. Distinguish a subject’s later reputation from evidence produced during their lifetime.

Best used for
  • Establishing names and roles
  • Building a first chronology
  • Locating cited institutions
Verify next

Personal papers, civil or court records, institutional files and the scholarship cited by the source.

Three-step research path

  1. Establish the record: confirm the title “Tomas Chlubna”, its source revision and the description used here.
  2. Expand the search: follow Tomas Chlubna primary sources, Tomas Chlubna archive and Tomas research across catalogues and specialist indexes.
  3. Test the account: compare the strongest cited source with the responsible institution’s current record and note any disagreement.

Questions for further research

  1. Which source most directly establishes the central claim about “Tomas Chlubna”?
  2. Which claims depend on a single source or contested interpretation?
  3. Which primary records establish identity, chronology and institutional ties?
Subject index

Search terms from this dossier

Source & attribution

This entry incorporates text from “Tomas Chlubna” on English Wikipedia. Contributors are listed in the page history. Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 License. Selected authority identifiers and statements are retrieved from Wikidata under CC0; their references and qualifiers remain part of the verification path.